loader
Page is loading...
OVERVIEW

Anthony C. Sallah
Associate

Grand Rapids

171 Monroe Avenue N.W.
Suite 1000
Grand Rapids, MI 49503-2694

P 616-742-3976

F 616-742-3999

OVERVIEW

Anthony C. Sallah
Associate

Grand Rapids

171 Monroe Avenue N.W.
Suite 1000
Grand Rapids, MI 49503-2694

P 616-742-3976

F 616-742-3999

Coming from a family of attorneys, Anthony Sallah knew very early on that practicing law was what he wanted to do. Diligent and approachable, Anthony is able to build bridges between parties facing commercial or construction disputes to find a way to reach the most desired result.

OVERVIEW

Coming from a family of attorneys, Anthony Sallah knew very early on that practicing law was what he wanted to do. Diligent and approachable, Anthony is able to build bridges between parties facing commercial or construction disputes to find a way to reach the most desired result.

Anthony counsels institutional and individual clients in complex commercial litigation and construction matters in federal and state court, at the trial and appellate level. Anthony also has deep experience before numerous arbitration tribunals, including the American Arbitration Association and the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS), and with arbitrations governed by international rules.  He focuses on devising creative and unique solutions to help clients succeed, doing so through the most efficient manner possible.

He represents clients in the prosecution and defense of claims involving deficient design, productivity and scheduling, acceleration and compression, and deficient installation of work. He has litigated on behalf of and against owners, contractors, designers, sureties, and engineering professionals in complex construction environments, including oil refineries, large-scale industrial facilities, urban towers, and university projects.

Anthony also has considerable experience defending clients in consumer-related class action litigation, prosecuting and defending false advertising and counterfeit Lanham Act cases, and product liability cases. 

Anthony brings a positive energy to his work. He collaborates with a variety of personalities in difficult commercial settings to help his clients achieve their goals, whether it be in the courtroom or via alternative resolution.

Anthony is not regularly admitted to practice law in the local courts of the state of Michigan.

Professional and Community Involvement

Member, American Bar Association Construction Law Forum

Member, Ohio State Bar Association

Member, Cleveland State Bar Association

Former board member, Adoption Network Cleveland

Former member, The William K. Thomas American Inn of Court

Experience

Litigation

  • Obtained nine-figure judgment on behalf of global medical manufacturer against various business and individual defendants, alleging state and federal civil RICO violations, trademark infringement, and unfair competition
  • Represented purchaser following a multimillion dollar acquisition involving claims for breach of contract, fraud, and intellectual property violations
  • Obtained dismissal of a corporate defendant in putative class action involving alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and various state consumer protection statutes
  • Obtained dismissal of managing member and limited liability company facing breach of fiduciary duty claims for alleged usurpation and competition
  • Prosecuted federal and state trademark infringement, unfair competition, and tarnishment claims on behalf of manufacturer against various individual and corporate defendants

Construction

  • Prosecuted and defended delay, disruption, and liquidated damages claims on an approximately 2,900 MW coal-fired power plant
  • Prosecuted and defended extra work, liquidated damages, and wrongful termination claims on a 400,000 gallon-capacity oil refinery
  • Represented nationwide contractor specializing in construction of urban towers and other vertical construction in disputes against owners, subcontractors, and design professionals
  • Represented a design-builder in claims against design professional related to design and construction of a large infrastructure project in Pacific
  • Successful appeal of a decision wherein the trial court erred in failing to conduct a hearing on the award of attorney’s fees under Ohio’s Prompt Payment Act
EXPERIENCE
INSIGHTS AND EVENTS
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.