Have you ever read a full set of jury instructions for a criminal trial, let alone a civil trial? What about just one instruction for one element of a crime? Can you recall Jack McCoy ever reciting the law to the jury in a closing argument on “Law and Order?” Jury instructions are a powerful tool and can play a vital role in communicating your client’s case to the jury. The key is making the instructions simple, concise and in plain English. Far too often lawyers miss the opportunity to advocate for their clients and communicate with the jury – through the most powerful medium, the Court - simply because they fail to advocate for simpler, easier to understand jury instructions. The education level of any given juror can vary widely depending on the jurisdiction but one thing always remains the same – their short attention spans. Most model jury instructions tend to be long, complex, and rambling sentences that would lose anyone. And, of course, there are some jury instructions like “burden of proof,” that are such boilerplate instructions it is not worth the effort to persuade the judge to change even a word of the instruction. So in addition to being clear and concise, you must pick the right instructions that will convey your client’s message, trial theme or defense to the jury. Last fall, Barnes & Thornburg clients Tokai Kogyo Ltd., a Japanese auto parts manufacturer and its U.S. subsidiary, Green Tokai Co. Ltd., located in Brookville, Ohio went to trial against the U.S. government to defend against allegations that the companies conspired with other manufacturers of auto body sealing parts to fix prices in violation of the Sherman Act. The government’s alleged proof, however, was almost entirely based on events and actions that occurred in Japan, not the United States. The government had a few documents but the lynchpin of its case was the testimony of the immunized witnesses. To complicate matters, the witnesses were not native English speakers so they testified in Japanese then had their testimony translated into English. A tried and true defense tactic is to attack the credibility of an immunized witness and expose their motivations for testifying to the members of the jury. So in our opening statement, we told the jury that the government was not seeking truth and justice with its prosecution and that the only “truth” they would hear from the cooperating witnesses was the government’s version of the truth. Following our opening statement and prior to calling the immunized witnesses, the Court read an immunity instruction requested by the government which was supposed to highlight for the jury that the testifying witnesses still faced some threat of prosecution by the government. On direct, the prosecution ended its questioning of each witness with the following question: “Why did you travel here to the United States today?” Each witness answered, “I came here because I wanted to tell the truth, as I knew, without delay, in regards to the customers and sales activities.” Then during cross-examination, the witnesses were questioned about their immunity, their non-prosecution agreements with the government, their invocation of their Fifth Amendment rights, and their fear of future of prosecution. But all of them were confused about these U.S. Constitution-based rights and none of them feared future prosecution for their crimes of price fixing or obstruction of justice. Based on the testimony we elicited at trial and the previous immunity instruction the government requested be read to the jury, we argued that the Court and the jury had been misled by the government because the witnesses had no real fear of prosecution. The witnesses had testified before the jury that they had only come to the United States to “tell the truth” but in reality, they had come to the United States because they had been required to do so in order to avoid prosecution completely. Therefore, we proposed that the judge add the following language to the immunity instruction previously given to the jury: It is in the discretion of the government to determine, in good faith, whether any of these witnesses have violated the September 2016 agreement.
The government is permitted to make these types of promises and agreements with witnesses. But you should consider the testimony of those witnesses […] with more caution than testimony of other witnesses. Consider whether their testimony may have been influenced by the government’s promises. You are not to convict the defendants based on the unsupported testimony of such a witness, standing alone, unless you believe his testimony beyond a reasonable doubt. The government initially objected but then relented after it was apparent that the judge was going to allow the jury instruction. Then, in closing arguments, we reiterated to the jury what the judge had already told them – that they needed to consider the testimony of the immunized witnesses with great caution because their testimony had been influenced by the government’s promise to never prosecute those witnesses for their crimes. These simple, concise instructions along with our presentation of key, material facts regarding the innocence of both Defendants was essential to obtaining acquittals for Tokai Kogyo and Green Tokai. In short, when it comes to instructing a jury, you may be better served to simply keep it “short and sweet.”Don’t Overthink It! Advocate for Easy to Understand Jury Instructions to Effectively Communicate Your Case
RELATED ARTICLES
Digital Asset Businesses Amp Up Their Compliance Measures to Avoid Insider Trading Actions
August 26, 2022 | The GEE Blog, Department of Justice, SEC
Is Crypto a Security? Insider Trading Case Leads to DOJ, SEC Scrutiny
July 27, 2022 | The GEE Blog, SEC, Insider Trading
Impact of Compliance Professional as New Fraud Section Chief
June 13, 2022 | The GEE Blog, Department of Justice
DOJ Issues Expedited FCPA Opinion, Shows Willingness to Communicate With Requestors
February 7, 2022 | The GEE Blog, FCPA, Department of Justice
The Enforcement Climate is Changing for ESG Disclosures
January 26, 2022 | Environmental, The GEE Blog
Digital Asset Businesses Amp Up Their Compliance Measures to Avoid Insider Trading Actions
August 26, 2022 | The GEE Blog, Department of Justice, SEC
Is Crypto a Security? Insider Trading Case Leads to DOJ, SEC Scrutiny
July 27, 2022 | The GEE Blog, SEC, Insider Trading
Impact of Compliance Professional as New Fraud Section Chief
June 13, 2022 | The GEE Blog, Department of Justice
DOJ Issues Expedited FCPA Opinion, Shows Willingness to Communicate With Requestors
February 7, 2022 | The GEE Blog, FCPA, Department of Justice
The Enforcement Climate is Changing for ESG Disclosures
January 26, 2022 | Environmental, The GEE Blog
Scope of DOJ’s Enforcement of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act After Van Buren
June 30, 2021 | The GEE Blog, Department of Justice
DOJ Targets COVID-19 Fraud With Coordinated, Multi-District Law Enforcement Action
June 2, 2021 | The GEE Blog, Department of Justice
Analyzing Price Gouging Under the Federal Defense Production Act
September 8, 2020 | The GEE Blog, Department of Justice
DOJ’s First FCPA Opinion Release in Six Years Highlights Long-Standing Principles
August 21, 2020 | The GEE Blog, FCPA
Don't Let DOJ Defections Fool You: Corporate Conduct Still in the Crosshairs
September 6, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers: Question 7
May 1, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers: Question 6
April 27, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers: Question 5
April 25, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers: Question 4 (Part 2)
April 7, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers: Question 4 (Part 1)
April 4, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
DOJ’s Corporate Compliance Program Guidance Provides Succinct Resource for Companies
March 31, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers: Question 3
March 31, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
Recently Announced: DOJ Will Extend the FCPA Pilot Program
March 28, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers: Question 2
March 21, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers: Question No. 1
March 17, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The Yates Memo – DOJ Issues Questions and Answers
March 15, 2017 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
Department of Justice Rolls Out FCPA Enforcement Pilot Program
April 8, 2016 | Department of Justice, FCPA, The GEE Blog
DOJ Launches Targeted Elder Justice Task Forces
April 1, 2016 | Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
A New Approach: DOJ Antitrust Division in Wake of Yates Memo
March 23, 2016 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
DOJ Leaves Much Unsaid After Announcing Need for Corporate Certifications to Finalize Settlements
March 8, 2016 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
The “Other Yates Memo:” DOJ to Enhance Workplace Safety Violation Prosecutions by Tacking On More Severe Charges Where Possible
February 8, 2016 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
“Hide No Harm Act Of 2015” Targets Employers, Directors and Officers
November 5, 2015 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT POLICY CHANGE TARGETS CORPORATE EXECUTIVES
September 11, 2015 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
What the DOJ Expects of 'Effective' Compliance Programs
August 12, 2015 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
U.S. v. Sigelman: Another FCPA Enforcement Setback for the DOJ
June 25, 2015 | FCPA, The GEE Blog
Justice Department Guidelines Seek to Focus Enforcement of Structuring Law on Most Serious Cases
June 8, 2015 | Department of Justice, The GEE Blog
THE BENEFITS OF COOPERATION – HYPERDYNAMICS AVOIDS INDICTMENT
May 29, 2015 | FCPA, The GEE Blog
RENEWED GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE IN ATTORNEY FEE ARRANGEMENTS?
May 28, 2015 | Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
Extradition from Japan: The Gamble
May 5, 2015 | Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
Self-Reporting: A Wise Strategy or Chasing Unicorns?
April 28, 2015 | SEC, The GEE Blog
Top 10 Takeaways from ABA White Collar Crime Conference 2015 (Part 2)
March 18, 2015 | The GEE Blog
Top 10 Takeaways from ABA White Collar Crime Conference 2015 (Part 1)
March 17, 2015 | The GEE Blog
Year in Review: Government Enforcement/Financial Litigation Developments
January 2, 2015 | FCPA, Financial Regulation, The GEE Blog
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL URGES COMPANIES TO COOPERATE AND CONDUCT THOROUGH INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS OF FCPA VIOLATIONS
November 21, 2014 | FCPA, The GEE Blog
Bio-Rad Settlement Reinforces FCPA Trends
November 7, 2014 | FCPA, SEC, The GEE Blog
A Cozy Relationship: The DOJ and JFTC, and the Potential Risks of Taking Advantage of JFTC’s Leniency Program
October 31, 2014 | Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
Supreme Court Passes on Esquenazi, Makes Instrumentality Test Settled Law
October 6, 2014 | FCPA, The GEE Blog
REDUCING THE COST OF FCPA MONITORING
June 11, 2014 | Bank Securities Fraud, The GEE Blog
Honest Services Fraud, Ray Nagin & "Big Easy" Money
March 28, 2014 | Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
My Partner Left Me for the Government! DOJ’s First Opinion Procedure Release of 2014 Approves Buyout of Minority Shareholder-Turned-Government Official
March 25, 2014 | FCPA, The GEE Blog
D.C. District Court Order Provides a Warning About Attorney-Client Privilege Protection for Internal Investigations
March 20, 2014 | Internal Investigations, The GEE Blog
Heightened SEC/DOJ FCPA Standards Offer Risks and Opportunities to Companies and Their Lawyers
March 18, 2014 | Financial Regulation, The GEE Blog
Top 10 Takeaways from ABA White Collar Crime Conference 2014 (Part 2 of 2)
March 13, 2014 | Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
Top 10 Takeaways from ABA White Collar Crime Conference 2014 (Part 1 of 2)
March 12, 2014 | Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
SEC’s New Priorities Continue to Come into Focus: Admissions of Liability
March 11, 2014 | Bank Securities Fraud, The GEE Blog
The Department of Justice Continues to Bring the "HEAT" in Pursuing Health Care Fraud
March 5, 2014 | Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
The Position Of Assistant Attorney General For The Criminal Division May Be Filled In The Near Future
February 19, 2014 | The GEE Blog
The CFTC: Armed and Dangerous
February 13, 2014 | Financial Regulation, Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
DOJ Wins Big Insider Trading Case: Martoma Conviction; Bad News for Cohen and SAC
February 8, 2014 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
Securities Regulators’ Increasing Use of Real-Time Monitoring Systems - Is Skynet Next?
January 31, 2014 | Financial Regulation, Government Investigations, Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
Going South: What U.S. Companies Need to Know About the FCPA and Doing Business in Latin America
January 30, 2014 | Criminal Procedure, Government Investigations, The GEE Blog
Welcome to The GEE Blog
January 18, 2014 | The GEE Blog
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center