A federal jury – not surprisingly from California – recently issued a whopping $185M ($185,000,000) punitive damages verdict in a single-employee gender discrimination case, believed to be a record award. The plaintiff also received over $872k in compensatory damages for front pay, back pay and emotional distress. The case is entitled Juarez v. AutoZone (Case No. 3:08-cv-00417), and currently sits in the Southern District of California. Ms. Juarez, who originally filed the suit in 2008, claimed that AutoZone imposed a glass ceiling on women through an opaque and intentionally discriminatory promotion system, alleging in her complaint a great disparity in the numbers of men and women managers in the San Diego area. After beginning her employment in 2000, Ms. Juarez asserted she was finally promoted to store manager in 2004 after making discrimination complaints, and that the discrimination continued after her son was born in May 2005. She states that her continued complaints were ignored and that she was demoted in February 2006. The most egregious allegation (obviously believed by the jury) was that the company devised a scheme to bring about her termination where a customer service representative allegedly misplaced money from the cash register, leading the company to blame and later terminate Juarez. Ms. Juarez then sued AutoZone for sex discrimination and retaliation under California state law. AutoZone’s chance to escape punitive damages (prior to appeal) was ended on November 18, when Judge Gallo denied the company’s bid for judgment as a matter of law on the punitive damages issue, finding that AutoZone’s legal arm could be found by a jury to be an officer, director, or managing agent of the company that committed, authorized, or ratified the actions taken against Ms. Juarez. Apart from the obvious takeaways in this matter related to discrimination and scheming to bring about the termination of an employee, the case is a good reminder of the potentially devastating costs at stake even in a single-employee discrimination case. Although I can’t imagine this incredible verdict amount being fully upheld on appeal, you know what they say about an ounce of prevention…
Yikes!! AutoZone Hammered with Record $185 Million Dollar Punitive Damages Jury Verdict
RELATED ARTICLES
Michigan Employers Get New Year Relief With Revised COVID-19 Anti-Retaliation Law
December 30, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Lessons
Does Same-Sex Harassment Support Gender Discrimination Claims? Texas Supreme Court to Decide
March 17, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
OSHA’s New Mandatory Electronic Recordkeeping Rule
June 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
New Year, New Laws: Welcome to 2016 in California
January 5, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Breaking News: Refusing to Allow an Employee to Rescind His Or Her Voluntary Resignation Can Get You Sued
November 21, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Michigan Employers Get New Year Relief With Revised COVID-19 Anti-Retaliation Law
December 30, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Lessons
Does Same-Sex Harassment Support Gender Discrimination Claims? Texas Supreme Court to Decide
March 17, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
OSHA’s New Mandatory Electronic Recordkeeping Rule
June 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
New Year, New Laws: Welcome to 2016 in California
January 5, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Breaking News: Refusing to Allow an Employee to Rescind His Or Her Voluntary Resignation Can Get You Sued
November 21, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Choose Your Words Wisely
September 3, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Pitfalls in Citing “Advice of Counsel” in Decision Making
May 7, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Alleged Victim of Sex Discrimination Recovers $13 Million
April 30, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Supervisors Are Employees Too … to the Tune of $6.6 Million
April 29, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Abusive Work Environment Proposed Legislation Introduced in Minnesota
March 27, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
When is a Disclaimer Not a Disclaimer?
March 27, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Data Released for 2014 Shows Uptick in Retaliation Charges and Allows For State-By-State Comparison of Charge Activity
February 6, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Nassar A Year Later: Pennsylvania ADA Retaliation Case Considers Impact of Supreme Court’s Decision
November 3, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Remember the Basics
October 30, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Devil’s in the Details - Make Sure Your Agreements Mirror Your Intentions
May 29, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Files ADA Claim Against Employer Due To “No Fault” Attendance Policy
May 20, 2014 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
How much can a Facebook post cost you? About $80K
February 27, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Update: Still Legal to Fire the ‘Irresistible’ Employee in Iowa
July 15, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit Finds Menial Tasks, Isolation, and Allegations of Violence Provide Pipeline to Jury Trial
April 2, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Some Basic Advice as “March Madness” Begins
March 15, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Illinois court revives Whistleblower Act claim of employee who was fired following fine
March 8, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Iowa Supreme Court Rules that Employer Lawfully Terminated "Irresistible" Employee
December 28, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Plaintiff’s Efforts to Preclude Her Deposition in Discrimination/Retaliation Suit Rejected by U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
June 13, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center