loader
Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo

Seventh Circuit Roundup: Major FLSA Decisions About Multi-Plaintiff Actions & Commuting Time (Plus Fourth Amendment Rules for Pole Cameras!)

January 8, 2025   |   Indianapolis
Kian Hudson

Kian Hudson

Partner
Appeals and Critical Motions Co-Chair
Mark Crandley

Mark J. Crandley

Partner
Appeals and Critical Motions Co-Chair
Kian Hudson

Kian Hudson

Partner
Appeals and Critical Motions Co-Chair
Mark Crandley

Mark J. Crandley

Partner
Appeals and Critical Motions Co-Chair

In this special episode, Mark and Kian welcome a third member to the podcast team – Lara Langeneckert, commercial litigator at Barnes & Thornburg and formerly of the Indiana Solicitor General’s Office and the Southern District of Indiana U.S. Attorney’s Office.

The team begins with a labor law extravaganza, discussing three significant cases under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): Jacks v. DirectSat, Acevedo  v. Professional Transportation, and Walters v. Professional Labor Group. These cases address the requirements for (and distinctions between) class actions and collective actions under the FLSA, as well as the FLSA’s rules for when employers must compensate employees for commuting time.

The episode concludes with United States v. House, which explores whether the Fourth Amendment requires the police to obtain a warrant before using a pole camera (i.e., a video camera affixed to a utility pole) to observe a suspect’s home.

Want to subscribe? Use the buttons in the player above, or plug this link into your favorite podcast app: https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/2178439.rss


Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.