loader
Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo
Vaccine

Potential NLRA Impacts of a Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination

Frank Mamat, Southfield Attorney

Frank T. Mamat

Attorney-In-Charge

With COVID-19 vaccinations now approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use authorization, employers are beginning to question whether they should require employees to get a COVID-19 vaccination. In making this decision, employers should be mindful of a number of legal considerations, one of which is the impacts of such a policy under the National Labor Relations Act.

It’s important to note that both union and non-union employers may be impacted by the NLRA. Specifically, Section 7 of the NLRA grants employees the right to engage in protected concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection, and makes it unlawful for an employer to interfere with or restrain employees in the exercise of those rights. Generally speaking, there is protected concerted activity when two or more employees act together to improve their terms and conditions of employment. 

Examples of protected activity in this context could include protesting against a mandatory vaccination policy (or the lack of one), organized office communications or flyers among coworkers concerning a vaccination mandate, or discussions among coworkers about the vaccine. Employers should exercise caution and consult labor and employment counsel before taking any adverse action against employees who collectively discuss or protest a mandatory vaccination policy, because such action could result in an unfair labor practice charge against the employer. 

If a union is already involved in the workplace, the starting point for employers is to consider whether the controlling collective bargaining agreement permits a mandatory vaccination policy or not. If a mandatory vaccination policy falls within the language of the collective bargaining agreement, then the employer may be able to unilaterally implement the work policy without first bargaining with the union. However, if a mandatory vaccination policy does not fall within the language of the collective bargaining agreement, requiring COVID-19 vaccinations may be considered a mandatory subject of bargaining that gives rise to a duty to bargain prior to implementation. Unilaterally implementing such a policy in this situation may lead to a meritorious unfair labor practice charge.

Although there are a number of legal considerations to take into account before implementing a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, employers should keep in mind the impacts of the NLRA to avoid an unfair labor practice charge.


RELATED ARTICLES

Rescue for Union Pension Plans – and Maybe Union Employers

March 17, 2021 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership

Buckle Up, Employers: PRO Act Passes the House

March 11, 2021 | Labor Relations, Federal Laws and Legislation, Union Organizing

Watch Out! Three Big Issues All Companies Need to Monitor at the NLRB

March 2, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Labor Agreements, Unions and Union Membership

Certain Cannabis Workers Are Not Protected by the NLRA

February 18, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

What Is The PRO Act And Should Your Company Be Concerned?

February 4, 2021 | Labor Relations, Federal Laws and Legislation, Union Organizing

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
NLRB NLRA
employers
employees
Mandatory Vaccine Programs
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.