loader
Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo
casting ballot

Unblocked: Labor Board Declines To Delay Decert Election Based On Pending ULPs


Last year, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a new rule that significantly altered its “blocking charge policy” that unions often invoke to delay employee efforts to decertify them. The new rule recently was seen in practice when an NLRB region declined to delay a decertification vote based on pending unfair labor practice charges.

As reported by Bloomberg Law: “An NLRB regional director rejected a union’s request to delay a decertification vote due to separate unfair labor practice charges pending against the company in federal court—in effect, declining to provide an exception to a Trump-era election rule that favors management when election disputes arise. The National Labor Relations Board regional director on Tuesday scheduled a decertification election involving workers at Wendt Corp., a New York-based machinery company, who are represented by Iron Workers Shopmen’s Local 576.”

The regional director determined that under the NLRB’s new policy, pending appeals over disputed unfair labor were not, alone, sufficient grounds to delay a vote. He explained in his written opinion: “Notwithstanding the Union’s request, the Board’s blocking charge policy does not contemplate delaying the conduct of an election. Rather, it provides that the Region may impound ballots cast during an election or impede the issuance of a certification of results pending resolution of any outstanding unfair labor practice charge.”

Under the NLRB’s prior “blocking charge” policy, the Board generally allowed unions to block a union election merely by filing a charge alleging unlawful conduct by the employer that would affect employee votes. Unions often used this tactic to delay decertification elections and in situations where they did not believe they had the necessary support to win a certification election. 

Under the new policy, however, the NLRB uses a vote-and-impound procedure. Elections are no longer blocked by pending unfair labor practice charges, as seen in this case, but the ballots are impounded until the charges are resolved. This new policy is a welcome change for companies and employees seeking to oust unions.


RELATED ARTICLES

Do You Now Have to Tolerate Profane or Abusive Outbursts by Employees at Work?

May 16, 2023 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Decaffeinated: Starbucks' Buffalo Baristas Seek Potential Ouster of Union

May 8, 2023 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership

Federal Court Fines Company Nearly $200k for Failing to Negotiate in Good Faith

April 24, 2023 | Labor Relations, Union Organizing, Unions and Union Membership, National Labor Relations Board

On the Hunt: NLRB’s Top Lawyer Seeks Out Cases to Upend Precedent

March 6, 2023 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Unions By the Numbers: 2023 Edition

January 19, 2023 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Labor Unions
Union Elections
Collective Bargaining
NLRB
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.