Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo

Long Road Ahead As Congress Begins Chipping Away At Workplace Arbitration

We have written extensively on the recent trend of courts across the country enforcing workplace arbitration agreements, including arbitration agreements with class and collective action waivers. Since the Supreme Court of the United States held in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis that arbitration agreements with class and collective action waivers are enforceable, many employers have opted to institute such agreements. Indeed, such agreements have become important tools for employers as they navigate the often tumultuous waters of workplace litigation, particularly class and collective action litigation.

Following the lead of some states in limiting workplace arbitration agreements, Congress is now beginning to wade in. The U.S. House of Representatives is prepared to vote on a bill that would invalidate workplace arbitration agreements and prevent companies from using this tool to avoid workplace class and collective actions. The bill, HR 1423, would also prevent such agreements in the consumer and antitrust contexts. The bill states that its purpose is to:

  • Prohibit pre-dispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration of future employment disputes
  • Prohibit agreements and practices that interfere with the right of workers to participate in a joint, class, or collective action

The bill’s proscription against these types of agreements would apply to both employees and independent contractors. Further, the bill expressly grants courts – not arbitrators – the authority to decide the validity and enforceability of an agreement to arbitrate.

Notably, the bill would not apply to arbitration agreements in collective bargaining agreements negotiated between employers and labor organizations. Further, the bill does not appear to prevent agreements to arbitrate entered into after a workplace dispute arises. In other words, although such an agreement is unlikely in reality, employers and employees may agree to resolve a specific, existing dispute before an arbitrator.

While this bill will likely pass the House, the absence of Republican support may well scuttle the bill in the Senate. Nevertheless, given the recent trend strongly favoring enforcement of workplace arbitration agreements, including those with class and collective action waivers, and the proliferation of these agreements post-Epic and Lamps Plus, employers would be wise to keep an eye on Congressional action (or inaction) in this regard.


Agreement to Arbitrate Acknowledged, Not Accepted, Eighth Circuit Says

July 17, 2019 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Fair Labor Standards Act, Employment Lessons, Labor and Employment

Will There Be An Epic Backlash?

June 27, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Supreme Court Watch, Labor and Employment

California Supreme Court Rejects Workplace Arbitration Agreement

September 13, 2019 | Employment Lessons, Labor and Employment

New York Passes Sweeping Changes to Anti-Harassment Law

June 25, 2019 | Employment Discrimination, Labor and Employment

Class Arbitrability is a Decision for the Court, Not the Arbitrator

July 24, 2019 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Labor and Employment


Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.