loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Another Noel Canning Rubber Stamp – Obama NLRB Overturns 1962 Case and Holds that Dues Checkoff Duty Now Continues Beyond Contract Expiration


In WKYC-TV, Inc., 359 NLRB No. 30 (2012) the Obama NLRB overturned Bethlehem Steel, 136 NLRB 1500 (1962), that for more than 50 years stated the rule that when a collective bargaining agreement expired the employer’s obligation to follow the agreement’s dues checkoff provision ceased. The Supreme Court’s decision in NLRB v. Noel Canning, 134 S. Ct. 2550 (2014), however, meant that the decision in WKYC-TV could not stand because, at the time of its decision, the NLRB included two members whose appointments were ultimately found to be constitutionally deficient under the recess clause of the United States Constitution. And, the WKYC-TV case then never came back to a constitutionally sufficient NLRB for rehearing. The Obama NLRB has not, however, been deterred. Now in a later case presenting the same issue, Lincoln Lutheran of Racine, 262 NLRB No. 188 (2015), the NLRB has reached the same result reached in WKYC-TV.  The NLRB majority (there were two dissents) held that “…following contract expiration [employers] must continue to honor a dues-checkoff arrangement established in that contract until the parties have either reached a successor collective-bargaining agreement or a valid overall bargaining impasse permits unilateral action by the employer.” This new rule will only apply prospectively because the NLRB’s holding changes the long standing NLRB rule articulated in 1962 in Bethlehem Steel. The two dissenting NLRB members (Philip A Miscimarra and Harry I. Johnson) disagreed with the majority finding the change was neither justified by the NLRA nor the policy considerations relied upon by the majority. The minority board members also predicted that the new rule articulated in Lincoln Lutheran of Racine will, if anything, inject less stability into collective bargaining relationships and create new issues for the parties to such agreements. That of course remains to be seen, but what is not in dispute is the current Obama NLRB’s willingness to revisit and overturn well established precedents all in the name of an evolving (and more pro-union) labor landscape.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Labor Board’s Boeing Handbook Rule Produces Encouraging Results

October 18, 2019 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Tight Ship: Labor Board Reports Improvement In Case Handling Statistics

October 14, 2019 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Final Exam? NLRB to AGAIN Address Whether Grad Students are Employees

September 23, 2019 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Why It's Critical That Employers Choose Words Carefully at the Bargaining Table

September 20, 2019 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Uh-Oh: Company’s Social Media Policy Ruled Unlawful

September 18, 2019 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
collective bargaining agreement
NLRB
Noel Canning
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.