Jason M. Zucchi

U.S. District Court Cases (representing plaintiffs)

• (E.D. Pa.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large medical device company involving spinal implants and implantation tools. Trial is scheduled for December 2023. 
• (D. Del.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large medical device company involving methods of designing custom knee implants. Successfully settled the case with defendant after obtaining favorable summary judgment rulings.
• (D. Del.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large automotive manufacturer and supplier in a long-running dispute involving tire pressure monitoring systems. A jury found the defendant liable for induced and contributory infringement and awarded damages. 
• (E.D. Tex.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large medical device company involving spinal implantation systems. A jury found the defendant liable for willful infringement and awarded damages. 
• (D. Nev.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large electronics manufacturer and supplier in a long-running dispute involving packages for surface-mount transformers. A jury found the defendant liable for willful infringement and awarded damages. The court later awarded the plaintiff a permanent injunction. The Supreme Court ultimately set a new standard for enhanced damages based on the case.
• (D. Del.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large medical device company involving point-of-care cell separation technology. Successfully settled the case after winning key claim construction rulings.
• (D. Del.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large medical device company involving craniofacial implants. Successfully settled the case with defendant after obtaining favorable rulings.
• (D. Del.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large navigation company involving computerized traffic routing systems. Successfully settled the case with defendant after obtaining favorable pre-trial rulings. 
• (D. Del.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against several cellular telephone companies involving third-party payment systems. Successfully settled the case with all defendants after obtaining favorable claim construction and pre-trial rulings. 
• (D. Del.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large automotive manufacturer involving tire pressure monitoring systems. Successfully settled the case after obtaining a favorable PTAB ruling.
• (D. Colo.) – Represented plaintiff in a patent case against a large medical device company involving methods of designing custom implants and other medical devices. Successfully settled the case with defendant after obtaining favorable rulings.
• (D. Minn.) – Represented plaintiff in a breach of contract case against medical device company involving stem-cell research. Successfully obtained a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

U.S. District Court cases (representing defendants)

• (D. New Jersey) – Represented defendant in a patent case against a large electronics company involving Ethernet connectors. After an invalidity trial that resulted in a hung jury, the defendant obtained a favorable cross-license for its patents in a co-pending case.
• (D. Minn.) – Represented defendant in series of patent infringement cases against a large vehicle manufacturer and supplier related to off-road vehicles. Successfully settled the case after winning several key rulings.
• (E.D. Texas) – Represented defendant in a multi-patent infringement case related to multi-display systems. Successfully settled the case after six months of litigation.
• (D. Del.) – Represented defendant in a multi-patent infringement case related to Quick Response Codes in product packaging. Successfully settled the case after only two months of litigation.
• (E.D. Texas) – Represented defendant in a patent infringement case related to blowers for the offshore drilling rig industry. Successfully vacated injunction after obtaining a favorable PTAB ruling.

Post-grant Proceedings

• (PTAB) – Represented petitioner in several inter partes reviews against a large medical device company involving patents covering continuous positive airway pressure masks and devices. Successfully settled the IPRs after obtaining several favorable PTAB and other rulings.
• (PTAB) – Represented respondent in several IPRs filed by a large automotive supply manufacturer during a co-pending District Court litigation. Successfully settled the District Court litigation after obtaining a favorable PTAB ruling.
• (PTAB) – Represented respondent in a several IPRs filed by petitioner during a co-pending District Court litigation. Obtained a favorable PTAB ruling and, once the District Court litigation resumed, a jury found the petitioner liable for infringement and awarded damages.

*These matters occurred before joining Barnes & Thornburg