loader
Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo
gavel money

Employers Beware: NLRB General Counsel Pushes for Expanded Economic Penalties


Historically, remedies for violations of the National Labor Relations Act (NRLA) have been limited to “make whole” remedies, and the only monetary remedy typically available was straight back pay in discharge cases. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo recently signaled a shift in policy that would greatly expand the universe of available remedies for discharge and other types of cases. 

On Sept. 8, 2021, Abruzzo issued a memorandum to all NLRB Regional Offices advising them to request from the Board “the full panoply of remedies available” for unfair labor practices. The memo discusses a variety of remedies that should be sought in different cases.

In cases involving unlawful firings, regions are encouraged to seek compensation for consequential damages, front pay, and liquidated back pay. Where the unlawful firings implicate undocumented workers, the remedies should also include compensation for work performed under unlawfully imposed terms, employer sponsorship of work authorizations, and any other remedy that would prevent an employer “from being unjustly enriched by its unlawful treatment of undocumented workers.”

For cases involving unlawful conduct committed during a union campaign, Abruzzo suggests regions seek remedies such as union access to employees; reimbursement of organizational costs; reading of the Notice of Employees and Explanation of rights by a principal or board agent; publication of the notice in newspapers; visitorial and discovery clauses to assist the agency in monitoring compliance with NLRB orders; extending posting periods for notices; training employees, supervisors, and managers of employees rights under the NLRA and compliance with Board orders; instatement of a qualified candidate of the union’s choice if a discharged employee is unable to return to work; and broad cease and desist orders.

This memo signals a stark departure from the types of limited “make whole” remedies traditionally awarded by the Board. While there have been NLRB back pay awards stretching into the millions in some cases, those were extremely rare. Employers should be prepared to face expanded remedies, especially increased monetary remedies, for violations before the Board.


RELATED ARTICLES

NLRB and Department of Labor Join Forces: What Does This Mean for Employers?

January 19, 2022 | Labor Relations, Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board

New Test for a New Year? Labor Board Reconsiders Independent Contractor Status

January 4, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Union Organizing

Union Organizing Alert: Micro-Units May Be Back at the Labor Board

December 16, 2021 | Labor Relations, Union Organizing, National Labor Relations Board

Abruzzo's Tweets Take Aim at Employer-Friendly Labor Law Precedent

December 8, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

What the 'Vaccine or Test' Mandate Means for the Union Workplace

November 16, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
NLRB General Counsel
NLRB
employer
NLRB NLRA
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.