loader
Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo
Teleconference

NLRB Nixes Telephonic Pre-Election Hearing, Orders Remote Video Hearing Instead


The NLRB, like many other institutions, has operated under social distancing conditions in recent weeks due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this week, however, the Board held that it would not permit just any type of remote proceedings in all circumstances. In Morrison Healthcare, the NLRB regional director ordered a pre-election hearing to take place telephonically. The employer objected to the telephonic hearing and the issue was presented to the Board.

Under already-existing Board rules, unfair labor practice proceedings may take place with “video testimony by contemporaneous transmission from a different location” where there is “good cause based on compelling circumstances” is present. While this rule expressly applies to unfair labor practice proceedings, no such explicit rule exists for representation proceedings, such as the pre-election hearing in Morrison Healthcare

The Board had no trouble extending the rule to apply to representation proceedings, allowing remote video testimony in such cases where good cause based on compelling circumstances is shown. However, the Board did not approve of the regional director’s order for a telephonic pre-election conference. 

The Board had never before allowed hearings to take place by telephone in any type of proceeding due to concerns about not being able to observe witness’ demeanor during cross-examination or to determine whether a witness is relying on documentation or other sources in order to testify. Noting that these same concerns applied to the pre-election hearing in this case, the Board found the hearing could not go forward by telephone. However, because the COVID-19 pandemic presents “good cause based on compelling circumstances,” the Board ordered the pre-election hearing to proceed via remote video testimony instead.

Recognizing that not all pre-election hearings involve witness testimony, the Board approved the use of telephonic proceedings when no witness testimony will be presented, and when there is good cause based on compelling circumstances. This case demonstrates that, while technology has allowed the Board to continue operations, it is still important to make sure the tenets of fairness to all parties are observed.


RELATED ARTICLES

Status Quo: Contract Bar Doctrine Remains Intact

April 22, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Labor Agreements

Who’s Down With PCA? All Employees Will Be Under Proposed New Standard

April 5, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

While increasing public outreach, NLRB staffs up for greater enforcement efforts

April 1, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Are the Rules Changing for Employer Dress Codes and Union Insignia?

February 15, 2021 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership, National Labor Relations Board

Do You Smell a Rat? Scabby Gets a Lifeline

February 11, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership, Strikes and Picketing

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
NLRB
union election
Labor Relations
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.