Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo
Censored pages - NLRB ignores vulgar buttons and stickers

WTF? NLRB’s OK with 'Cut the Crap?'

Gerald Lutkus

Gerald F. Lutkus

Of Counsel (Retired)

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has yet again undercut employers’ efforts to limit profane and vulgar language by workers finding vulgar buttons and stickers to be protected speech under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

In Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Nevada Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T and Communication Workers of America, Case # 20–CA–080400, the board ruled that the two companies violated the NLRA when they attempted to block workers from wearing buttons and stickers containing the phrase “Cut the Crap” and the abbreviation “WTF.” The buttons and stickers read “WTF Where's the Fairness,” “FTW Fight to Win” and “Cut the Crap! Not My Healthcare.” In overturning an administrative law judge's (ALJ) prior ruling and holding 2-1 that the buttons and stickers were protected speech, the board majority found the language not to be so profane as to lose protection of the Act, particularly where the "WTF" and "FTW" buttons and stickers “provided a nonprofane, nonoffensive interpretation on their face.”

The board’s final order in the case barred the two companies from maintaining and enforcing an overbroad rule which banned these employees from wearing the union-provided pins and stickers. The companies were further ordered to cease and desist from refusing to let employees work unless they removed this union insignia.

The case is the latest in a series of cases in which the board is making it very clear that a wide variety of foul, vulgar and otherwise offensive language remains protected speech and does not lose its protection under the Act when the language is used in the context of concerted activity. In the Plaza Auto Center, Inc., Hooters, and Starbucks cases, the Board also condoned extremely offensive language and overturned decisions to terminate employees.

Employers who are considering discipline or termination of employees for foul, vulgar and/or offensive language must step carefully given this series of decisions. You must first make certain that the language used could not be considered to have been part of a discussion or interchange with the employee that could be viewed as concerted activity.


Do You Now Have to Tolerate Profane or Abusive Outbursts by Employees at Work?

May 16, 2023 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Labor Board Has Yet To Issue Significant Decisions Under Biden – Why?

March 25, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court Favors Employer Property Rights Over Union Access To Employees

June 30, 2021 | Labor Relations, Union Organizing, National Labor Relations Board

Goodbye NY: No Union For Uber Drivers…For Now

June 11, 2021 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, State Labor Laws, Unions and Union Membership


Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
Protected Speech
Workplace Conduct
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.