loader
Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo
generic_insight_detail

NLRB HACKS EMAIL SYSTEMS OF EVERY BUSINESS IN THE U.S.


Earlier today, the NLRB reversed existing precedent and granted all employees the right to use their employer’s email systems for union organizing and other forms of protected concerted activity. In Purple Communications, Inc., the employer’s policy limited employee use of its email and other electronic systems to “business purposes only” and “specifically prohibit[ing]” certain uses by employees. While the employer had a policy that all parties acknowledged complied with existing law, the Board  reversed course, declaring 2007 decision in Register Guard, was “clearly incorrect.” The Board majority contends that its decision was “carefully limited,” because it applies only to employees that “have already been granted access to the employer’s email system in the course of their work and does not require employers to provide such access.” However, Board Member Johnson in dissent argues, “that the new rule is a radical one is unsurprising given that my colleagues have both disregarded the substantial differences between email and face-to-face communication and have failed to consider the revolutionary social networking developments that have occurred since Register Guard issued, which make access to employer email systems even more unnecessary for employees to engage in Section 7 activity.” The Board majority held that an employer could “justify a total ban on nonwork use of email, including Section 7 use on nonworking time, by demonstrating that special circumstances make the ban necessary to maintain production or discipline;” or, "absent such justification, may apply uniform and consistently enforced controls over its email system to the extent such controls are necessary to maintain production and discipline.” However, that potential limitation ignores the realities of the modern workplace. As dissenting Board Member Miscimarra pointed out the current state of electronic communication “render implausible any suggestion that employees are unreasonably prevented from engaging in NLRA protected communications absent a statutory right to conduct such activities on the employer’s business email system.” Given the breadth and scope of this ruling, future appellate review is likely.


RELATED ARTICLES

Decaffeinated: Starbucks' Buffalo Baristas Seek Potential Ouster of Union

May 8, 2023 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership

Federal Court Fines Company Nearly $200k for Failing to Negotiate in Good Faith

April 24, 2023 | Labor Relations, Union Organizing, Unions and Union Membership, National Labor Relations Board

Will The NLRB Soon Give Clarity On Captive Audience Meetings?

April 20, 2023 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

Inflation: Labor Board Charge and Petition Activity Continues to Soar

April 12, 2023 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Union Organizing

Judge: Starbucks Illegally Threatened Workers During Union Campaign

February 7, 2023 | Unions and Union Membership, Union Organizing, National Labor Relations Board, Labor Relations

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
email
Section 7
Union Organizing
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.