I recently had occasion to look into Mexican law regarding non-competition agreements. For those who are unfamiliar with Mexican noncompete law, it can be summarized succinctly: see California. Like the Golden State, Mexico takes a dim view toward non-competition agreements. In fact, the unenforceability of restrictive covenants is not even a matter of Mexican statute, it’s actually embedded into the country’s Constitution. Specifically, Article 5 of the Mexican Constitution provides that “the State cannot permit the execution of any contract, covenant, or agreement having for its object the restriction, loss or irrevocable sacrifice of the liberty of man, whether for work, education, or religious vows . . . Likewise no person can legally agree to his own proscription or exile, or to the temporary or permanent renunciation of the exercise of a given profession or industrial or commercial pursuit. A labor contract shall be binding only to render the services agreed on for the time set by law and may never exceed one year to the detriment of the worker, and in no case may it embrace the waiver, loss, or restriction of any civil or political right. Non-compliance with such contract by the worker shall only render him civilly liable for damages, but in no case shall it imply coercion against his person.” Another provision, Article 123(aa), similarly provides that contractual stipulations implying the waiver of any right designed to favor the worker in the laws of protection and assistance for workmen shall be considered null and void. In short, covenants not to compete are unenforceable in Mexico and there is no chance of an employer successfully obtaining injunctive relief to stop an employee from working for a competitor. Worse, covenants not to solicit customers similarly are regarded in Mexico as unenforceable. On the other hand, non-disclosure provisions designed to protect a company’s trade secrets and confidential and proprietary business information can be enforced. In other words, Mexican law on restrictive covenants resembles that of California. To get around these restrictions, some employers opt to pay employees a lump sum of money when they start a job to buy their voluntary compliance with a noncompete. If the employee leaves and starts working for a competitor, the employer at least has the ability to file suit to get the money back. While this will not stop a disloyal employee from leaving for the competition, it may give them a reason to hesitate before doing so – particularly if the amount provided up front is significant. The alternative is to write off the noncompete altogether and opt to seek remedies associated with trade secrets and confidential information.
RELATED ARTICLES
Six Statements That May Mean Your Business Will Keep an Employment Lawyer Busy
June 1, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Illinois Cracks Down on Non-competes for Low-Wage Workers
September 7, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
State Noncompete Statutes, Your Company, and the Economy: One Perspective
February 29, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Massachusetts and the Impending Death of Noncompetes Part II: De Facto Enforcement of Noncompetes
February 15, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Groundhog Day: Declaring the Impending Death of Massachusetts Noncompetes
February 8, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Six Statements That May Mean Your Business Will Keep an Employment Lawyer Busy
June 1, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Illinois Cracks Down on Non-competes for Low-Wage Workers
September 7, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
State Noncompete Statutes, Your Company, and the Economy: One Perspective
February 29, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Massachusetts and the Impending Death of Noncompetes Part II: De Facto Enforcement of Noncompetes
February 15, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Groundhog Day: Declaring the Impending Death of Massachusetts Noncompetes
February 8, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Pennsylvania Supreme Court “Considers” Noncompetes: Mere Continued Employment Not Enough
November 19, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Noncompete Roundup – Florida
November 7, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Noncompete Roundup – Oklahoma
November 6, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Think Before You Shoot on Noncompete: Why The Threatening Letter May Not Be Your First Move
October 12, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
An Annual Ritual: Massachusetts Noncompete Legislation
July 1, 2015 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Did California Just Fire No-Employment Provisions From Settlement Agreements?
April 13, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Some HR Numbers That Should Be Zero In Your Organization
February 16, 2015 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Five Things to Know About Trade Secrets
December 22, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Five Distinctive Things About Ohio and Employment Law
November 10, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Beware of the court of public opinion
October 28, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Confidentiality & Nondisclosure Agreements Are No Substitute For Noncompetes
October 27, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Opinions About Noncompetes: Actual Supporting Data Not Required
June 23, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
It’s Back: Proposal to Ban Massachusetts Noncompetes (and Related Economic Theories)
April 14, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Employers, You All Have Secrets: New Report Might Help You Protect Them
April 6, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Have You Double-Checked The Language Of Your Non-Compete Lately? If Not, You Need To...
March 26, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Behind “Obnoxious” Headlines, A Good Noncompete Strategy Reminder
March 18, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
There Were No Mice Available? Testing Noncompetes and Motivation in Settings That Don’t Sound Much Like Employment
February 17, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Split Decision: Top 5 Noncompete Stories Lean Slightly in Favor of Enforcement
February 3, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Different Strokes for Different Folks (or Red, Blue, and Purple-Pencil America): How The 50 States Differ On Revising Non-Competes
January 3, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Coast to Coast Noncompete Part 2: Still Going in 3 Courts in 2 States
December 23, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
December Is Noncompete Month in the General Media
December 16, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Coast-to-Coast Noncompete Dispute Highlights 3 Key Enforcement Strategies
October 22, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Governor Would Like Massachusetts to Join California As a Non-Noncompete State
September 16, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
State Lines May Not Be When It Comes to Noncompetes
September 3, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Do You Have Restrictive Covenants In Texas? If So, Be Careful What You Ask For
August 30, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio Supreme Court Reverses Self on Noncompete in Merger Situation
October 11, 2012 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center