loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Watch What You Write, Watch What You Say

Trace Schmeltz

Trace Schmeltz

Partner
Financial and Regulatory Litigation Group Co-Chair

While market manipulation cases typically involve circumstantial evidence, prosecutors are finding more sophisticated ways to get defendants’ direct statements into evidence. In market fraud cases, government prosecutors are required to prove a defendant’s state of mind (the criminal intent component of a case). Historically, they have done so based on what the defendant did under specific circumstances—something referred to as “circumstantial evidence.” For example, an insider trading case may turn on the circumstance that a corporate insider had earnings information on the date she sold large quantities of corporate stock. Or, a market manipulation case may turn on the trades a defendant entered into after receiving a specific phone call. Another significant component of such cases is the defendant’s own notes and comments. In recent insider trading convictions, juries have been captivated by defendants’ own statements captured through government wiretaps. In the 2015 Rajaratnam insider trading trial, the prosecution introduced 2,400 taped calls into evidence—many of which included Raj stating he had insider information on which he intended to trade. The risk that such statements will be used against defendants is much higher today than ever before because of the government’s increased use of wiretaps to record defendants. Indeed, as Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, has said, the “aggressive use of wiretaps is important. It shows that we are targeting white-collar insider trading rings with the same powerful investigative tools that have worked so successfully against the mob and drug cartels.”  Such wiretaps allow prosecutors to prove intent in market manipulation or trading cases with direct evidence rather than the type of circumstantial evidence previously the hallmark of such cases. Even in the age of technology, handwritten notes will continue to feature prominently in such cases, particularly when those notes reflect a defendant’s intent. In addition, expect wiretaps in all sorts of white collar cases going forward.  Finally, don’t expect to be able to hide by using technology—the FBI has made it clear that it has figured out how to track conspirators attempting to hide their communications by chatting over headphones while playing video games together. In short, watch what you write and watch what you say.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Salman, Reaffirms Broader View of Insider Trading

December 7, 2016 | case-to-watch, insider-trading, The GEE Blog

U.S. Supreme Court Revisits Insider Trading in Salman

October 6, 2016 | insider-trading, The GEE Blog

REST IN PEACE, NEWMAN – SO WILL THE GOVERNMENT LAY DOWN IN SALMAN?

October 5, 2015 | insider-trading, The GEE Blog

WHY NEWMAN MIGHT NOT BE HEADED TO THE SUPREME COURT

August 11, 2015 | insider-trading, The GEE Blog

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Insider Trading
market fraud
market manipulation
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.