On February 26, 2018, the United States Supreme Court is set to hear arguments regarding whether public employees who decide to not join their designated union may still be charged “agency fees” in support of collective bargaining in the case styled as Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. The Court’s 1977 decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education allows unions to charge fees to non-members for collective bargaining, but prohibits unions from charging non-members for customary political causes, such as political donations and lobbying. Janus challenges fees paid in 22 states by firefighters, teachers, police, and other public workers that declined to join unions. The unions they refused to join must still represent them with respect to collective bargaining issues. At the heart of their position, the public workers challenge the Abood decision through the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act (the “IPLRA”), which states that public sector unions owe a duty of fair representation to members of a bargaining unit when the workers elected that union to be their representative. Once the union is elected to be the representative, all workers are entitled to the union’s representations regardless of whether they are actually union members. Unions in Illinois, however, typically negotiate a “union security clause,” which authorizes the union to force non-union members to pay agency fees for wages, hours, and other conditions of employment. The public workers at issue in Janus argue that they have a constitutional right to free speech under the First Amendment to refuse payment for benefits and services received from the union contract when they opted to not join the union. The crux of their argument is that all union activity is inherently political, and that it would therefore violate their free speech rights under the First Amendment to compel them to pay for the union’s political activity. It will strike a blow to unions and their security in the public sector if the Court determines that the “fair share” fees are unconstitutional. Unions may see a significant diminution in union density and an inability to financially support continued operations and efforts. The Court’s decision in Janus will likely have significant influence on the future of unions and their negotiation power.
Supreme Court to Decide Whether “Fair Share” Fees Violate Free Speech
RELATED ARTICLES
NLRB Says Employers Can Change Arbitration Agreements After Being Sued
August 15, 2019 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
Union Folds In Class Action Lawsuit Over Forced Union Dues
May 8, 2019 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership
Finality at Last: Supreme Court Overrules NLRB’s Controversial Policy Against Employee Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
May 21, 2018 | National Labor Relations Board, Labor Relations
Will Mandatory Fees to Public Unions Survive? SCOTUS Set to Revisit the Issue
October 5, 2017 | Union Organizing, Unions and Union Membership, Labor Relations
Public Union Forced “Agency Fees” on the Chopping Block Again
June 20, 2017 | Unions and Union Membership, Labor Relations
NLRB Says Employers Can Change Arbitration Agreements After Being Sued
August 15, 2019 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
Union Folds In Class Action Lawsuit Over Forced Union Dues
May 8, 2019 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership
Finality at Last: Supreme Court Overrules NLRB’s Controversial Policy Against Employee Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
May 21, 2018 | National Labor Relations Board, Labor Relations
Will Mandatory Fees to Public Unions Survive? SCOTUS Set to Revisit the Issue
October 5, 2017 | Union Organizing, Unions and Union Membership, Labor Relations
Public Union Forced “Agency Fees” on the Chopping Block Again
June 20, 2017 | Unions and Union Membership, Labor Relations
‘Let’s Get Ready To Rumble!’ Class Action Waiver Battle Kicks Off At Supreme Court
June 15, 2017 | National Labor Relations Board, Labor Relations
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Overturns Illinois Forced Union Dues Statute
June 30, 2014 | Union Organizing, Unions and Union Membership, Labor Relations
Breaking News: Supreme Court limits unionization for “partial public employees.”
June 30, 2014 | Unions and Union Membership, Labor Relations
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on the Constitutionality of Public Sector Unions
January 22, 2014 | Unions and Union Membership, Labor Relations
Supreme Court Hears Noel Canning Oral Argument
January 14, 2014 | Labor Relations
Supreme Court Takes a Pass on Unite HERE v. Mulhall
December 11, 2013 | Labor Relations
Supreme Court to Review Legality of Union Neutrality Agreement
June 25, 2013 | Unions and Union Membership, Labor Relations
Supreme Court to Hear Recess Appointment Dispute
June 24, 2013 | National Labor Relations Board, Labor Relations
Department of Justice Files Writ of Certiorari with U.S. Supreme Court in Noel-Canning Case
May 1, 2013 | National Labor Relations Board, Labor Relations
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center