loader
Page is loading...
Ohio

In-House Attorneys Cannot Be Bound By Non-Competes In Ohio


If you’re an Ohio in-house attorney and you value your freedom to make career moves, then you’re in luck. On Feb. 7, the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct issued an opinion letter stating that in-house counsel cannot be bound by non-compete agreements.

Ohio Rule of Professional Conduct 5.6(a) states that a lawyer may not participate in an “agreement that restricts the right of a lawyer to practice after termination of the relationship, except an agreement concerning benefits upon retirement.” There is a strong public policy allowing parties to be represented by the counsel of their choice, and any agreement that restricts an attorney’s ability to practice would undermine that public policy. 

Although Ohio is generally a friendly state to employers regarding non-compete agreements, employers must establish a protectable interest to enforce such covenants. According to the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct, “a lawyer’s professional autonomy and a client’s freedom of choice outweigh a business’s interest in protecting itself from competition.” However, this should not be a cause of concern to employers. One of the predominant reasons for requiring employees to sign non-compete agreements is to protect the employer’s confidential information. Presumably, this should not be an issue with attorneys who would be bound by the attorney-client privilege not to disclose confidential information they learn of in the course of providing legal advice.

The board clarified that if an in-house attorney has both business and legal job functions, the attorney may still agree to a non-compete that covers their business services, so long as it does not prevent them from practicing law after their separation of employment. 


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Indiana Considers New Restrictions on Non-Compete Covenants for Physicians

February 5, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Non-competes and Trade Secrets

Medical Marijuana is Coming to Ohio– What Employers Need to Know

March 23, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law

On Second Thought … State Supreme Court Questions Key Noncompete Drafting Strategy

December 18, 2017 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law

California Dreaming: Court Upholds Restrictions in Employment Agreement, Bars Use of Confidential Information

September 12, 2017 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Ohio
noncompete agreements
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.