loader
Page is loading...
GoldenGate

Hindsight Isn’t 20/20 When It Comes To An Insurer’s Duty To Defend In California


You are a California policyholder and have been sued in a lawsuit. Your insurer denies coverage, claiming that it has no duty to defend the lawsuit. After the lawsuit concludes, you file suit against your insurer, contending that the insurer breached its duty to defend and engaged in bad faith. During discovery in the bad faith and coverage lawsuit, your insurer seeks broad-ranging discovery about what transpired in the underlying lawsuit after the insurer denied coverage with an eye toward finding evidence to bolster its denial of coverage. Is this a permissible practice?

Not in our view. Under California law, the existence of an insurer’s duty to defend is based upon those facts known by the insurer at the inception of the underlying lawsuit. This is a question which is not judged on the basis of hindsight but rather from all of the information available to the insurer at the time of tender of the defense. In light of the foregoing temporal relevance rule, insurers have a duty to investigate before denying coverage and cannot rely on after-acquired evidence.

Although the law on these issues has been on the books for years, in our experience insurance companies continue to use the same playbook: denying that they have a duty to defend based upon the allegations in a complaint or demand letter and then seeking everything possible in discovery. Accordingly, when faced with an insurer’s effort to conduct an after-the-fact investigation to bolster its denial of coverage, do not assume that it is permissible for your insurer to do so.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

When Can Recovery from Insurers Exceed Policy Limits?

February 7, 2019 | Policyholder Protection, insurance

Don’t Accept Policy Exclusions at Face Value, Especially in California

June 1, 2018 | claims, indiana-insurance-coverage, insurance, Policyholder Protection

It’s Not Over Until It’s Over: An Insurer’s Continuing Duty To Defend After The Dismissal Of Covered Claims

March 16, 2018 | claims, indiana-insurance-coverage, insurance, Policyholder Protection

Clock Keeps Running on Insurers’ Good Faith and Fair Dealing Obligations in California

October 13, 2017 | indiana-insurance-coverage, Policyholder Protection

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Duty to Defend
California policyholder
bad faith
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.