loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: COURT OKS “INFLEXIBLE” SIX MONTHS OF LEAVE

William Nolan

William A. Nolan

Partner
Columbus Managing Partner

Must an employer allow more than six months sick leave to an ill employee? In Hwang v. Kansas State University, a federal appeals court answered with a clear, "No." An assistant professor at Kansas State University was diagnosed with cancer and needed extended time off for treatment. The university granted the professor a six-month paid leave of absence, but it declined to extend her leave after a subsequent request for more time. The university cited its “inflexible” policy, which allowed no more than six months of sick leave. The professor could not otherwise perform her job and the university terminated her employment. In response to the termination, the professor filed a lawsuit contending that the university violated the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits those who receive federal funding from discriminating on the basis of disability and was the precursor of (and bears a strong resemblance to) the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The court wrote, “Reasonable accommodations . . . are all about enabling employees to work, not to not work.” The court agreed with the university that the purpose of the Rehabilitation Act is “to prevent employers from callously denying reasonable accommodations that permit otherwise qualified disabled persons to work — not to turn employers into safety net providers for those who cannot work.” Although this case is favorable to employers faced with the decision of providing extended leave to an employee, inflexible leave policies remain a target of the EEOC. Employers should work with counsel to carefully design leave policies that comply with federal and state laws, and certainly consult with counsel before terminating any employee with health issues. *Jackie Gessner is a summer associate with Barnes & Thornburg and a student at Robert H. McKinney School of Law: Indiana University.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Sixth Circuit Confirms Standard for 'Regarded As' Discrimination Under the ADA

November 12, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

Position Is Not Vacant If It Is Being Held For an Employee on FMLA Leave

October 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues

EEOC Pay Data Collection: One and Done?

September 18, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, EEOC

Seventh Circuit Holds ADA Does Not Necessarily Require Remote Work Arrangement

July 8, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues

Extreme Obesity Not Necessarily a Disability Under ADA, Says Seventh Circuit

June 20, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
ADA
EEOC
Paid Leave of Absence
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.