loader
Page is loading...
Joint Employers

Clarity At Last: Joint Employers Must Exercise Substantial Direct and Immediate Control


The NLRB announced today that it is set to publish its long awaited joint employer rule on Feb. 26, 2020. To be a joint employer under the final rule, a business must possess and exercise substantial direct and immediate control over one or more essential terms and conditions of employment of another employer’s employees. 

The final rule defines key terms, including what are considered “essential terms and conditions of employment,” and what constitutes “direct and immediate control” as to the essential employment terms. The final rule also defines what constitutes “substantial” direct and immediate control and makes clear that sporadic and isolated control is not “substantial.” 

The clarity provided by this rule will be welcomed by employers that have been operating under a tenuous joint employer standard for many years. In 2015, the NLRB issued a decision in Browning-Ferris that changed the previous “direct control” test to a more lenient test that would establish joint employment even if the company exercised “indirect control” or “reserved” the right to control, essential employment terms of another employer’s employees. The NLRB reversed course in 2017, only to later vacate that decision after one of the NLRB members was found to have an ethical conflict. The NLRB then decided to address the joint employer issue through its rulemaking powers, and it issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in September 2018

Under the new rule, evidence of indirect or contractually reserved control over essential employment terms may be a consideration for finding joint-employer status, but it will not be determinative without substantial direct and immediate control. 

The rule, which will become effective April 27, 2020, received more than 28,000 comments from the public. The rule will have a profound positive impact on businesses engaged in franchising and those that heavily utilize staffing agencies or third party labor providers. Under the new rule, it will be less likely that one company will be liable for the unfair labor practices of another. Similarly, it will be less likely that a company will be subjected to union picketing and other economic pressure during a labor dispute between a union and another entity.


RELATED ARTICLES

Labor Day 2020: State of the U.S. Labor Unions

September 4, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

UPDATE: Can You Prohibit Employees From Using Cell Phones At Work?

August 24, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Oh Snap! Employee Lawfully Terminated For Profanity-Laced Facebook Post

August 18, 2020 | Labor Relations, Social Media and Technology, National Labor Relations Board

NLRB Offers Some Pandemic Labor Law Clarity

August 12, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

NLRB OK’s Employer’s Moonlighting Ban

August 5, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
joint employer
NLRB
employers
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.