Kyle LeClere

Kyle W. LeClere

Partner, Co-chair, Consumer and Industrial Products Litigation

Kyle LeClere defends well-known brands in major product liability, toxic tort and commercial litigation matters around the country. His smart strategies and defense tactics make him a go-to resource for even the most challenging disputes. This is why clients trust him to defend their interests in matters big or small.

Kyle is appreciated by clients and colleagues alike for his ability to manage extensive litigation portfolios involving products such as home appliances, paints, inks and other industrial and consumer products. Kyle also serves as national products counsel for multiple Fortune 500 companies and advises clients across many industries on civil litigation matters involving personal injury, property damage and breach of warranty claims, as well as complex commercial agreements.

Quote Icon
Drawing on experience litigating cases nationwide - from pre-lawsuit negotiations to trial - I enjoy working closely with clients to define success and work to achieve it."
Experience
  • Barnes & Thornburg attorneys defended The Valspar Corporation in a case brought by an over-the-road trucker who alleged he developed Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS) when exposed to fumes from our client’s paint product, which leaked from 55-gallon drums plaintiff was hauling. The defendant proved that the steel drums had been reconditioned by a third-party, which had marked the drum according to its specification under the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) implementing the federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA). Granting Valspar’s motion for summary judgment, the Court found, that the defendant was “entitled to rely on the reconditioner’s mark when it accepted the drum in question and is not ultimately liable for any potential defects attributable to the reconditioner. ” The Court held that the HMTA preempted all of Plaintiff’s claims. This case could set a precedent for future cases as it addressed and affirmed the preemptive effect of a shipper’s federal right to rely on the DOT specification markings on an allegedly defective container supplied by a third party. Plaintiff has appealed to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The decision is reported at Noffsinger v. The Valspar Corp.
  • The State of Indiana, a Barnes & Thornburg client, will now be able to seek up to $177 million in damages against IBM for breaches of a $1.6 billion services agreement to help enhance the state’s public welfare system.

    The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling on Feb. 13, saying that IBM fell short of what it promised. In her majority opinion, Chief Judge Nancy H. Vaidik wrote: “In the most basic aspect of the contract – providing timely services to the poor – IBM failed.”

    The Court also affirmed that no deferred fees ($43 million) were owed to IBM and reversed two separate awards of prejudgment interest and fees to IBM of more than $13 million; awards on equipment fees and assignment fees for IBM were affirmed, to be offset by the State’s damages.

    The case now goes back to Marion County Superior Court to determine the State’s damages.

    Barnes & Thornburg partners Peter Rusthoven and John Maley headed a litigation team that included Curt Greene, Meredith White, Kyle LeClere, Roxanne Larrison and multiple others throughout several offices.
Credentials

Education

  • Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, J.D., certified legal intern in Civil Practice Clinic
  • University of Notre Dame, B.A., political science, Rev. Theodore Hesburgh Program in Public Service

Bar Admissions

  • Indiana

Court Admissions

  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Insights & Events