U.S. Supreme Court

• Michigan v. EPA (U.S. 2015) – Arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of 21 States and over the opposition of the U.S. Solicitor General and 16 other States, persuaded the Court to hold unlawful an EPA regulation that imposed $9.6 billion in annual costs on the electric-utility industry.*
• Woods v. Etherton (U.S. 2016) – Based on the briefs alone, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the client, issuing a unanimous summary reversal in a habeas case concerning ineffective-assistance-of-counsel and Confrontation Clause claims arising from a felony drug offense.*
• Coleman v. Tollefson (U.S. 2015) – Obtained a 9-0 victory after oral argument in the U.S. Supreme Court in a statutory-interpretation case concerning the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s “three strikes” rule.*
• Woods v. Donald (U.S. 2015) – In another 9-0 summary reversal, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously agreed and reversed the Sixth Circuit’s decision to grant habeas relief, thereby upholding a first-degree-murder conviction against a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.*
• Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak (U.S. 2012) – Served as the primary drafter of a merits brief that prevailed over the U.S. Solicitor General’s Office and preserved an individual’s right to bring an administrative-law claim without being subject to the immunity provisions of the Quiet Title Act.*
• Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. Coeur Alaska, Inc. (U.S. 2009) – Assisted the client in prevailing in the U.S. Supreme Court on a permitting issue under the Clean Water Act by drafting a successful petition for certiorari (over an opposition by the U.S. Solicitor General’s Office) and drafting the prevailing merits briefs.*
• When the Supreme Court called for a response to six certiorari petitions filed on behalf of 17 major companies and a national law firm that all challenged a Michigan tax statute and that sought a return of more than $1 billion in taxes, identified a jurisdictional obstacle to the Court’s review, and the Court declined to hear the challenges.*

Sixth Circuit

• Successfully defended, in 2019, a district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of the client in a contract dispute involving a commercial-property listing agreement.
• Bormuth v. County of Jackson (6th Cir. 2017) – Arguing before the en banc court, represented 22 states in a religious-liberty case, and the court agreed with the states and with the county and upheld the practice of legislative prayer.*
• Self-Insurance Institute of America v. Snyder (6th Cir. 2014) – Successfully defended a state tax statute designed to bring in $400 million a year against a challenge that a federal statute, ERISA, preempted the law.*

Seventh Circuit

• Secured dismissal of an employment dispute from the Seventh Circuit in 2020, as the court agreed that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

Ninth Circuit

• Acting as a friend of the court, filed a brief on behalf of a national association in support of a state regulatory board, to assist in defending a state law against a preemption challenge. In 2020, the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of the state board, concluding that a federal drug law did not preempt the state law.
• In 2020, persuaded the Ninth Circuit, based on the briefs alone, to reverse a district court’s grant of summary judgment against a client, a technology company, which allowed it to continue to pursue its insurance claim against its insurer.

Michigan Supreme Court

• Persuaded the Michigan Supreme Court to grant oral argument on an application in a case addressing a statute that governs tax foreclosures. The case is pending before the Michigan Supreme Court.
• In re Rasmer Estate (Mich. 2017) – Successfully defended the Medicaid estate-recovery program that Michigan implemented to comply with federal law.*
• Citizens Protecting Michigan’s Constitution v. Secretary of State (Mich. 2018) –Represented the Attorney General as an amicus curiae, in an elections case, and defended the Secretary of State’s decision that a proposed amendment creating a redistricting commission did not qualify as a ballot measure.*
• Michigan Association of Government Employees v. State of Michigan (Mich. 2016) – Successfully defended a breach-of-contract action on behalf of the state.*
• Yono v. Department of Transportation (Mich. 2015) – Secured agreement from the Michigan Supreme Court that governmental immunity barred a tort claim against the state and did not fall within the highway exception to immunity.*
• NACG Leasing v. Department of Treasury (Mich. 2014) – Prevailed on behalf of the state agency, in a case concerning how a use tax applied to an aircraft lease.

*These occurred prior to joining Barnes & Thornburg.