loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Newsletters

Barnes & Thornburg LLP Commercial Litigation Update - December 2015

December 7, 2015   |   Atlanta | Chicago | Los Angeles | Columbus | Delaware | South Bend | Elkhart | Dallas | Grand Rapids | Indianapolis | Minneapolis | Fort Wayne

Welcome to the December 2015 edition of the Commercial Litigation Update, an e-publication that features articles authored by the attorneys in Barnes & Thornburg LLP's Commercial Litigation Practice Group. To read an article from this month's edition of the Commercial Litigation Update e-newsletter, click on the hyperlinks in the article titles below.


Two Recent Arbitration Cases Address the Impact of Underlying Contract Provisions 
By Timothy J. Abeska

Recent cases have addressed how agreeing to the rules of an arbitral forum can delegate arbitrability questions to the arbitrator, and that parties cannot contractually modify appellate rights. Read more about the importance of drafting arbitration provisions.

Seventh Circuit Provides Guidance on Creation of “Requirements Contracts” Under the UCC 
By Mark J. Crandley

The Seventh Circuit has recently provided important guidance exploring the parameters of when a “requirements contract” comes into being under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Learn why this is important for purchasers and suppliers.

Court Shuts Down Goodyear’s Discovery Shell Game
By Bradley B. Falkof

Counsel for parties responding to discovery, whether they be in-house, outside or local counsel, must be vigilant in responding accurately and completely to discovery requests. Read more about Haeger v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. and why the line between consequences for intentional misconduct and just plain sloppy discovery responses continues to narrow all the time.

Georgia Supreme Court Significantly Broadens the Duty to Preserve Evidence
By James J. Leonard

In the recent case, Phillips v. Harmon, the Georgia Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision expanding the scope of a potential litigant’s duty to preserve evidence. Read more about this case and why commercial litigants should develop policies and procedures for when and what extent document and physical evidence retention is triggered.

Amidst the Commotion, Make Sure You Are Handling Noncompete Basics 
By William A. Nolan

Amid unprecedented conversation about noncompetes, it is important to revisit the basics of noncompete drafting and enforcement. Learn more about noncompetes and the how this tool can protect your business resources.


© 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is proprietary and the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. It may not be reproduced, in any form, without the express written consent of Barnes & Thornburg.

This Barnes & Thornburg LLP publication should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own lawyer on any specific legal questions you may have concerning your situation.

Follow us on Twitter @BTLawNews.

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.