loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Your Facebook “Like” May Be Constitutionally-Protected Speech


Like DislikeAccording to a recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, pressing the “like” button on your Facebook page constitutes substantive speech that may be protected by the First Amendment.

Six employees of the Hampton, Virginia Sheriff’s Office were dismissed because they showed support for Sheriff B.J. Roberts’ electoral opponent. They filed suit against Sheriff Roberts, claiming in part that their terminations violated the First Amendment. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted summary judgment to Sheriff Roberts, in part because the court found that the employees failed to allege that they had engaged in protected speech.

The plaintiff of significance in this matter, Roy Carter, Jr., claimed his protected speech in support for Sheriff Roberts’ opponent came in the form of a Facebook “like” for the opponent’s page. The Eastern District of Virginia held that the thumbs-up button by itself did not constitute sufficient speech to merit First Amendment protection. Not so, ruled the Fourth Circuit – when Carter pressed “like,” he caused to be published on his Facebook profile and on his friends’ news feeds that he liked Sheriff Roberts’ opponent’s campaign, which is a substantive statement.

“That a user may use a single mouse click to produce the message that he likes the page instead of typing the same message with several individual key strokes is of no constitutional significance,” held the court. Further, the Court stated that hitting the “like” button is the internet equivalent of displaying a political sign in one’s front yard, which the Supreme Court has held constitutes substantive speech.

The district court’s ruling was reversed for Carter and two other plaintiffs and the matter was remanded. Although the three remaining plaintiffs may not recover monetary damages because of the sheriff’s Eleventh Amendment immunity, they may have an opportunity to be reinstated.

The full text of Bland v. Roberts may be found here.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Which Side Will Justice Gorsuch Fall On Public Sector Union Fees?

March 5, 2018 | Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law

Asking: “How much do you currently make?” in 2018?

December 29, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law

Can Employers Terminate an Employee Because of Vacation Photos Posted to Facebook?

April 28, 2017 | Employee Leave, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law

Using an Employee’s Social Media Posts to Prove Laziness? Think Again

November 21, 2016 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law

Employers Need Not Tolerate Workers Screaming On the Electronic Street Corner

June 6, 2016 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Facebook
First Amendment
social media
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.