While market manipulation cases typically involve circumstantial evidence, prosecutors are finding more sophisticated ways to get defendants’ direct statements into evidence. In market fraud cases, government prosecutors are required to prove a defendant’s state of mind (the criminal intent component of a case). Historically, they have done so based on what the defendant did under specific circumstances—something referred to as “circumstantial evidence.” For example, an insider trading case may turn on the circumstance that a corporate insider had earnings information on the date she sold large quantities of corporate stock. Or, a market manipulation case may turn on the trades a defendant entered into after receiving a specific phone call. Another significant component of such cases is the defendant’s own notes and comments. In recent insider trading convictions, juries have been captivated by defendants’ own statements captured through government wiretaps. In the 2015 Rajaratnam insider trading trial, the prosecution introduced 2,400 taped calls into evidence—many of which included Raj stating he had insider information on which he intended to trade. The risk that such statements will be used against defendants is much higher today than ever before because of the government’s increased use of wiretaps to record defendants. Indeed, as Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, has said, the “aggressive use of wiretaps is important. It shows that we are targeting white-collar insider trading rings with the same powerful investigative tools that have worked so successfully against the mob and drug cartels.” Such wiretaps allow prosecutors to prove intent in market manipulation or trading cases with direct evidence rather than the type of circumstantial evidence previously the hallmark of such cases. Even in the age of technology, handwritten notes will continue to feature prominently in such cases, particularly when those notes reflect a defendant’s intent. In addition, expect wiretaps in all sorts of white collar cases going forward. Finally, don’t expect to be able to hide by using technology—the FBI has made it clear that it has figured out how to track conspirators attempting to hide their communications by chatting over headphones while playing video games together. In short, watch what you write and watch what you say.
RELATED ARTICLES
U.S. Supreme Court Decides Salman, Reaffirms Broader View of Insider Trading
December 7, 2016 | Case to Watch, Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
U.S. Supreme Court Revisits Insider Trading in Salman
October 6, 2016 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
REST IN PEACE, NEWMAN – SO WILL THE GOVERNMENT LAY DOWN IN SALMAN?
October 5, 2015 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
INSIDER TRADING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS – MORE ON TWO HOT TOPICS THAT HAVE NOW CONVERGED
September 28, 2015 | Insider Trading, SEC, The GEE Blog
WHY NEWMAN MIGHT NOT BE HEADED TO THE SUPREME COURT
August 11, 2015 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
U.S. Supreme Court Decides Salman, Reaffirms Broader View of Insider Trading
December 7, 2016 | Case to Watch, Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
U.S. Supreme Court Revisits Insider Trading in Salman
October 6, 2016 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
REST IN PEACE, NEWMAN – SO WILL THE GOVERNMENT LAY DOWN IN SALMAN?
October 5, 2015 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
INSIDER TRADING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS – MORE ON TWO HOT TOPICS THAT HAVE NOW CONVERGED
September 28, 2015 | Insider Trading, SEC, The GEE Blog
WHY NEWMAN MIGHT NOT BE HEADED TO THE SUPREME COURT
August 11, 2015 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
NINTH CIRCUIT SLAPS BACK REMOTE TIPPEE’S NEWMAN DEFENSE
July 15, 2015 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
“HELLO, NEWMAN” -- GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO LITIGATE REVERSED INSIDER TRADING CONVICTIONS
March 9, 2015 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
CRIMINAL INSIDER TRADING CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED IN FAR-REACHING RULING
December 23, 2014 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
The Acquittal of Rengan Rajaratnum: A Precursor for Acquittals or No Action in Other “Remote Tippee” Cases?
July 15, 2014 | Bank Securities Fraud, The GEE Blog
Is the Second Circuit About to Put the Brakes on the Government’s Pursuit of Insider Trading “Tippees”?
April 29, 2014 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
Case to Watch – Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice – Has the Supreme Court undermined the misappropriation theory of insider trading?
March 29, 2014 | Case to Watch, Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
DOJ Wins Big Insider Trading Case: Martoma Conviction; Bad News for Cohen and SAC
February 8, 2014 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
SEC Continues to Struggle in Insider Trading Jury Trials
February 7, 2014 | Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
Securities Regulators’ Increasing Use of Real-Time Monitoring Systems - Is Skynet Next?
January 31, 2014 | Financial Regulation, Government Investigations, Insider Trading, The GEE Blog
Let the Light of Day Shine
January 18, 2014 | Financial Regulation, The GEE Blog
Barnes & Thornburg Legal Alert - Government Regulators Continue to Make Insider Trading a Trial Priority
January 16, 2014 | Financial Regulation, The GEE Blog
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center