Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., holding in a 5-4 decision that pharmaceutical sales employees are exempt outside salespeople. The decision may be read here. The case is significant for several reasons.
The most obvious reason is that it represents our highest court interpreting the outside sales exemption, so any business relying on (or thinking of relying on) this exemption should review the decision with counsel to ensure ongoing compliance. The central issue in Christopher was whether the pharmaceutical sales representatives were actually involved in "sales." The U.S. Department of Labor in "friend of the court" briefs has taken the position in recent years that an employee is making a sale only where the employee is involved in the transfer of title to customers. Pharmaceutical reps are "only" obtaining informal commitments from doctors to prescribe certain drugs. The Court rejected the DOL's interpretation, finding it was not supported by the statute. Second, the decision is significant in that it reminds employers that not every administrative decision will be supported by the courts. In a period where the National Labor Relations Board is scrutinizing social media policies, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is attacking background checking procedures, it is worth remembering that these interpretations of federal agencies may not stand up to judicial scrutiny in the medium term. No employer wants to be the "test case," but employers should discuss this aspect of administrative guidance with counsel when formulating their compliance strategies. (Another example reported on last week is here.) Finally, both the closeness of the decision and the fact that the dispute arose from the DOL taking a more aggressive position with the change in administration in 2009 emphasize the significance of the upcoming Presidential election for how these issues are likely to play out in the next few years.RELATED ARTICLES
No Right, Just Rules: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Steakhouse Managers’ Claims
October 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
Agreement to Arbitrate Acknowledged, Not Accepted, Eighth Circuit Says
July 17, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, High Stakes Employment Issues, Fair Labor Standards Act, Employment Lessons
Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations
July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal
June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Supreme Court Holds Title VII Charge-Filing Is Mandatory but Not Jurisdictional
June 7, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
No Right, Just Rules: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Steakhouse Managers’ Claims
October 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
Agreement to Arbitrate Acknowledged, Not Accepted, Eighth Circuit Says
July 17, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, High Stakes Employment Issues, Fair Labor Standards Act, Employment Lessons
Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations
July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal
June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Supreme Court Holds Title VII Charge-Filing Is Mandatory but Not Jurisdictional
June 7, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Will There Be An Epic Backlash?
June 27, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Says No To Repeat Class Actions After Statute Of Limitations
June 14, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court to Take Up Independent Contractor Arbitration Case
February 28, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court is Asked to Answer the Question: What Do You Mean by ‘Sex’?
September 11, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Sticks and Stones: When Texts and Emails Will Hurt You
July 18, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Did a Lower Court Throw Schools an IEP Life Raft?
July 5, 2017 | Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Are You Recording This Conversation?
June 5, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Update on Trump’s Line-Up for DOL and Supreme Court
March 28, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Nominee Gorsuch Receives ABA’s Highest Rating
March 10, 2017 | Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Case Sent Back to Lower Courts by Supreme Court
March 8, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The World According to Trump: Could the Obama NLRB’s Pro-Union Rulings be Undone?
November 17, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
The World According to Trump: Trump’s Impact on Traditional Labor
November 15, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Fifth Circuit Triples Down on the Legality of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
August 15, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Hits Ceiling in Continual Push to Expand Scope of Protected Concerted Activity
July 5, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Critical of NLRB’s Investigation Confidentiality Concerns
June 23, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
The Seventh Circuit Rejects Class & Collective Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements
June 3, 2016 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Once Again Puts Employers on Notice Regarding Handbook Policies
October 27, 2015 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Are Your Employees Religious Enough For The NLRB?
August 31, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Challenge to NLRB “Ambush Election Rules” Fails
July 31, 2015 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
A Reminder from the NLRB to Scrutinize Your &!^@$) Policies
May 26, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
THE SEC JOINS THE NLRB IN ATTACKING EMPLOYEE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS
April 17, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Shows No Signs of Releasing Its Death Grip on Employer Handbooks
March 26, 2015 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Non-Union Employers Beware – The NLRB May Come Knocking On Your Door
March 20, 2015 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Who Knew? U.S. Supreme Court Justices Offer Employment Tips
February 26, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Year in Social Media: Four Big Developments from 2014
December 29, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB “Likes” Employees’ Facebook Argument
September 2, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Declines to Appeal Class Action Waivers to Supreme Court: What Does it Mean for Employers?
July 21, 2014 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Outlier…or NLRB Shift on Social Media Policies?
July 7, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Fifth Circuit Denies NLRB’s Rehearing Request on Class Action Waivers; NLRB Likely to Continue Ignoring Fifth (and Other) Circuit Court Rulings
April 21, 2014 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Not April Foolin’: National Labor Relations Board Finds Employer Rule Requiring Positivity and Professionalism Unlawful
April 7, 2014 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB "Gives Up the Ghost" On Posting Rule Fight
January 9, 2014 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Rule Against Non-Union Workplace “Disruptions” Can Run Afoul of NLRA
October 28, 2013 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Offers Further Clarification Regarding Expression of Employees’ Section 7 Rights on Social Media
May 23, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Congress Rejects Password Protection Amendment To CISPA
April 24, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
8th Circuit Upholds Class Waivers in FLSA Cases
January 9, 2013 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Examines “Supervisor” Definition In Bias Suits
November 27, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
On The Radar: Supreme Court Set to Resolve Circuit Split as to Definition of Supervisor Under Title VII
October 24, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Even When You Win, You Might Still Lose: NLRB Strikes Back After Employer Prevails In Federal Court
October 10, 2012 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Social Media Decisions Leave Questions for Employers
October 4, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
The NLRB, EEOC and Social Media
September 4, 2012 | Pregnancy, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court's Ruling on Healthcare Impacts Employers
June 29, 2012 | Employee Health Issues, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Employment Provision in Arizona Immigration Law
June 27, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Complete Overview of the NLRB’s Memorandum Regarding Social Media Policies in the Workplace
June 4, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center
LEAVE YOUR COMMENT