loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Lessons Learned: Job Descriptions Do Matter


When was the last time you reviewed the job descriptions of your employees?  At the time of the review, did you ask supervisors to review the job descriptions to see if they were accurate?  What about the employees – did you have each employee review and sign the applicable job description, acknowledging that it accurately described the job duties as performed by the employee?  While there is no legal requirement to regularly update job descriptions (or even to have them), the 11th Circuit’s decision in Mason v. United Parcel Services serves as a reminder that job descriptions do matter. In Mason, the Plaintiff claimed that UPS failed to accommodate her various lifting restrictions and thus discriminated against her in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act. In affirming summary judgment for UPS, the 11th Circuit explained that in determining whether a function is essential, relevant evidence includes (among other things) the employer’s judgment as to what functions are essential, a written job description and the amount of time actually spent performing the function. As to the written job description for Mason’s position with UPS, it required (among other things) that employees like Mason be able to lift packages (of a certain weight) above their shoulders and lower them to foot level – two actions Mason could not do because of her alleged disability.  Because Mason failed to rebut evidence (from the job description) that those two actions were, in fact, essential functions, the court found UPS had no duty to excuse Mason from performing them. This case serves as an important reminder for all employers that now would be a good time to review written job descriptions to make sure they are up-to-date and accurate, and that they clearly delineate essential and non-essential job functions (and the physical or mental abilities needed to perform them).


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Illinois EPA Amendment Lowers Standard For Discrimination Claims

August 8, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations

July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch

Extreme Obesity Not Necessarily a Disability Under ADA, Says Seventh Circuit

June 20, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues

Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal

June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination

Don't Assume That One-Size-Fits-All Employment Policies Work Everywhere

April 5, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Disability
Discrimination
Employers
Job descriptions
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.