loader
Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo
generic_insight_detail

Department of Labor Aims to Rescind ‘Persuader Rule’; Comments Due Aug. 11


Last month, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) submitted a notice of proposed rulemaking intended to rescind what is known as the “persuader rule.” We previously reported that the persuader rule, which was first published in 2016 during the Obama administration, was controversial and had been tied up in litigation for months; at the end of 2016, a federal court stopped it from being enacted. The rule would have required employers to publicly disclose certain relationships with labor relations consultants, including the identity of any outside attorneys or consultants that may affect employees’ rights to engage in protected activity, the terms of any such engagement, and the activities to be performed by the attorney or consultant. There is a 60-day comment period for the proposed rescission of the persuader rule and all comments must be received by the DOL no later than Aug. 11. Many companies were primarily concerned that the rule would test the limitations of the attorney-client privilege and the privacy of consultant relationships protected by the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). Luckily for employers, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a nationwide injunction in November 2016 to prevent the rule from going into effect. The Texas court found that the persuader rule exceeded the DOL’s rulemaking authority because it required employers to report relationships and information that was explicitly protected from disclosure by the LMRDA. The DOL’s notice of rulemaking offers various reasons for its decision to rescind the rule; namely, that the persuader rule expanded reporting requirements “by requiring the reporting of employer-consultant agreements under which the consultant undertakes activities that do not involve direct contact between consultants and employees.” Such a rule is inconsistent with the LMRDA, which states that no report is required for services of a consultant, including an attorney, simply by agreeing or giving advice to an employer.


RELATED ARTICLES

DOL Proposes Broad Independent Contractor Rule: What Businesses Need to Know

October 12, 2022 | Labor Relations, Department of Labor

NLRB and Department of Labor Join Forces: What Does This Mean for Employers?

January 19, 2022 | Labor Relations, Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board

Hey, Hey, Hey, Goodbye: DOL Persuader Rule Nixed

July 17, 2018 | Department of Labor, Labor Relations

UPDATE: Does Misclassifying Employees As Independent Contractors Violate Labor Law?

April 13, 2018 | Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board, Labor Relations

Union Organizing Threat: Are Worker Centers Labor Organizations?

March 20, 2018 | Union Organizing, Labor Relations

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
DOL
LMRDA
Persuader Rule
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.