Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo

Michigan's Right to Work Law Gets Personal - Union Intimidation and Threats Alleged

Last month we blogged about how the Michigan Education Association (MEA), the union that represents the vast majority of Michigan’s teachers, only had one percent of teachers seeking to revoke dues payments under Michigan’s Right to Work Law. Well, now we may know part of the reason why.

The Mackinac Center Legal Foundation has filed unfair labor practices with the Michigan Employment Relations Commission (MERC) on behalf of seven teachers who say they were intimidated and bullied by the MEA. More specifically, it is alleged the MEA was less than forthcoming about its “August window” to withdraw from the Union. The details of MEA’s alleged actions and the ULP Charges appear in both the Mackinac Center’s press release and a related article.

The issue is this: The MEA Bylaws provide that in order to withdraw from the union, a member must provide notice of the withdrawal within a 31-day period in August. Notice provided at any other time of the year will not be effective. As we have previously discussed, such “window periods” have been upheld by the NLRB for the private sector in the context of dues payroll deductions, even in Right to Work states (although automatic dues deduction is not an issue in the MEA case, since Michigan law was changed last year to prohibit payroll deductions for union dues for school employees). MERC has also specifically approved the MEA August window period as acceptable under Michigan law in the past. However, the teachers in this case claim that Michigan’s new Right to Work law changes the legality of such window periods.

By all accounts this is an open issue that needs to be addressed specifically under Michigan’s Right to Work statutes. NLRB rule is not necessarily applicable given that it interprets the NLRA, and not Michigan’s Public Employment Relations Act (“PERA”), which applies to the MEA teachers in this case. It remains to be seen whether MERC will consider the Right to Work law to change not only an employee’s ability to leave the union and stop paying dues, but also what types of restrictions public unions can put on the timing and manner of such requests.

See all of our previous Right to Work coverage here.


What’s Brewing at Starbucks? Labor Law Litigation Over Employee Terminations

April 26, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Union Organizing

Up and Away: Union Organizing Skyrockets 57% in Last Six Months

April 19, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Union Organizing

Unions by the Numbers: 2022 Edition

January 24, 2022 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership, Union Organizing

Union Organizing Alert: Micro-Units May Be Back at the Labor Board

December 16, 2021 | Labor Relations, Union Organizing, National Labor Relations Board

Union Challenge to Vaccine Mandate Hits Legal Snag

October 15, 2021 | Labor Relations, Unions and Union Membership


Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
Labor Unions
Right to Work
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.