loader
Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo
generic_insight_detail

D.C. Circuit Calls Out NLRB For “Interpretive Leap”


Pro-employer interests received an energizing shot in the arm from a recent D.C. Circuit opinion. In Flagstaff Medical Center Inc. v. NLRB , the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals was reviewing the NLRB's 2011 ruling that the company president's remarks that “ I would not be negotiating with the union” or " ” y ou won't be negotiating with me” constituted threats that unionization would be futile and were evidence of anti-union animus. The D.C. Circuit disagreed, stating that “[t]he record does not support this interpretive leap.”

The D.C. Circuit found that these statements were made in regard to the president's attendance at the meetings and not the company's willingness to negotiate. The full opinion can be found here .


RELATED ARTICLES

Reversing the Call: NLRB Seeks to Rescind 2020 Rule, Protect Union Status

November 8, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Do Smartwatches, GPS Devices, and Other Employee Tracking Technologies Violate Labor Law?

November 1, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

Labor Board Issues Updated Guidance on Injunction Actions

October 31, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board

NLRB Rules Dues Checkoff Must Continue After Collective Bargaining Agreement Expires

October 7, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

Mailing It In? Labor Board Signals Potential Return To Manual Elections

October 3, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board, Unions and Union Membership

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
NLRB
Unionization
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.