loader
Page is loading...
generic_insight_detail

Inconsistent Statements Can Be Costly For Employers


The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma recently denied an employer’s motion for summary judgment on a former employee’s FMLA interference claim. While litigating the matter, the employer argued that the employee never truly was eligible to receive benefits under the FMLA (despite previously granting the employee leave under the Act). In response, the employee presented evidence that a supervisor had assured her while she was out on leave that her job was secure.  According to the court, this assurance could ultimately estop (prevent) the employer from later challenging the employee’s eligibility under the FMLA. Bottom line:  Make sure management and benefits personnel are on the same page in order to prevent inconsistent messages from being communicated to employees.


LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

RELATED ARTICLES

Position Is Not Vacant If It Is Being Held For an Employee on FMLA Leave

October 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues

Accommodate Much? Restrictive Seventh Circuit Leave Ruling Lives On

April 5, 2018 | EEOC, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law

Attention Illinois Employers: 3 Handbook Policies to Revisit Now

October 13, 2017 | EEOC, Employee Leave, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law

The Gradual But Decided Shift to a Much More Complex World of Employment Law

September 29, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law

Subscribe

Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
FMLA
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.