The Administrative Review Board (Board) for the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently issued a decision, expanding the scope of the whistleblower protections under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). In Spinner v. David Landau and Associates, LLC., the Board specifically rejected an earlier decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and, instead, found that SOX’s whistleblower protections extend to the employees of contractors and subcontractors of publicly traded companies.
In the Spinner case, Thomas Spinner was a Certified Public Accountant, working for David Landau and Associates, LLC (DLA). According to Spinner, DLA provided internal audit, forensics, and advisory and management consulting services, including SOX audit and compliance services. Spinner alleged that DLA performed audit services for a publicly traded company, and Spinner alleged to have worked on this account. In the litigation, Spinner alleged that he had reported he had discovered problems with reconciliation and internal controls at that publicly traded company. Spinner claimed that following this report, DLA removed Spinner from the account and terminated him. Spinner filed a whistleblower complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which concluded that DLA would have terminated Spinner even if Spinner had not reported fraud at that publicly traded company. Spinner appealed the case to an administrative law judge. The Administrative Law Judge granted summary judgment to DLA on the grounds that because DLA itself was not a publicly traded company, Spinner was not protected by the SOX whistleblower protection. Spinner then appealed the ALJ’s decision to the Board. The Board stated that the issue in this matter was whether the scope of whistleblower protections of SOX extended to an employee of a contractor of a publicly traded company “when the employee reports activity that he reasonably believes constitutes a violation of the laws or SEC regulations identified under [SOX].” Under SOX, the regulations define an employee as “an individual presently or formerly working for a company or company representative … or an individual whose employment could be affected by a company or company representative.” The regulations also define a “company representative” as “any officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of a company.” Although these definitions are fairly straightforward, earlier this year, in Lawson v. FMR, LLC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled that employees of a contractor or subcontractor to a publicly traded company are not entitled to SOX whistleblower protections. I n the Spinner matter, the Board declared that the Lawson ruling was not controlling, as federal agencies are not bound by the decision of a circuit court in litigation arising in other circuits. The Board also stated it was “imperative to fully explain the basis for [its] holding that accountants employed by private accounting firms, who in turn provide SOX compliance services to publicly traded corporations, are covered as employees of contractors under Section 806.” The Board found that the statutory definition of “employee” did not create a limitation on that term and the Board refused to impose such limitation. The Board also refused to limit the scope of the statutory section entitled, “Employees of Publicly Traded Companies.” The Board then reviewed the legislative history of SOX. Specifically, the Board declared that “Congress plainly recognized that outside professionals – accountants, law firms, contractors, agents, and the like – were complicit in, if not integral to, the shareholder fraud and subsequent cover-up officers of the publicly traded Enron perpetrated. … Congress was clearly concerned about the role Arthur Anderson played in the Enron ‘debacle’ and the retaliation exercised against one of its partners who attempted to blow the whistle.” Finally, the Board stated that the whistleblower protections of SOX were analogous to other statutes with whistleblower protections such as Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, the Energy Reorganization Act, and the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002. According to the Board, these statutes have long case histories supporting the holding that the employees of contractors of covered employers are also offered legal protections from whistleblower retaliation. Based on those reasons, the Board rejected the Lawson decision and held that the SOX’s whistleblower protections extend to the employees of contractors and subcontractors of publicly traded companies.DOL Decision Supports Expansion of SOX Whistleblower Protections To Contractors of Publicly Traded Companies
RELATED ARTICLES
Salaried-Basis Employees in the World of Temporary COVID-19 Furloughs
April 3, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act, Department of Labor
DOL Issues New Opinion Letters on Wage and Hour Issues – Compensability of Health-Related Rest Breaks
April 18, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Know Before You Go: Does the DOL’s New PAID Program Pay Off For Employers?
April 16, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
What’s Old Is New Again: DOL Resurrects Advisory Opinion Letters
January 16, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
The DOL Just Flipped Its Position on Paying Interns
January 10, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Salaried-Basis Employees in the World of Temporary COVID-19 Furloughs
April 3, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act, Department of Labor
DOL Issues New Opinion Letters on Wage and Hour Issues – Compensability of Health-Related Rest Breaks
April 18, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Know Before You Go: Does the DOL’s New PAID Program Pay Off For Employers?
April 16, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
What’s Old Is New Again: DOL Resurrects Advisory Opinion Letters
January 16, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
The DOL Just Flipped Its Position on Paying Interns
January 10, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
As Predicted, DOL Proposes Changes to Tip Pool Rule
December 29, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
DOL Invites Public Input: Rethinking the Stalled Questions on Overtime
July 26, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Department of Labor Abandons Obama Overtime Rule
July 11, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Current Administration Considers EEOC and Labor Department Subagency Merger
May 19, 2017 | Affirmative Action, EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Update on Trump’s Line-Up for DOL and Supreme Court
March 28, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
December 1 Overtime Rule Blocked
November 22, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Down to the Wire: DOL’s “Blacklisting Rule” Enjoined
October 25, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Overtime Rules Challenge - Business Groups and States Seek Expedited Relief
October 17, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
No Matter Who Becomes President, Expect More Change in National Labor and Employment Policy
October 12, 2016 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Oklahoma and U.S. DOL Agree to Tag-Team Worker Misclassification Initiatives
September 16, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Employee Misclassification as Independent Contractor
September 12, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
New Overtime Rules: All That Glitters Is Not Gold
May 20, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
UPDATED: DOL Unveils New Overtime Regulations
May 18, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Department of Labor to Issue Finalized White Collar Exemption Rule on Wednesday, May 18
May 17, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
11th Hour Questions about DOL’s Overtime Rules
April 19, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
EMPLOYERS BEWARE! - DOL’S FINAL OVERTIME RULE COMING SOON!
March 23, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Wage Wars: The Plaintiff’s Bar Awakens
December 4, 2015 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Comment Period for Controversial Overtime Rule Closes Soon
September 1, 2015 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
DOL TO CONSIDER RULE ON PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES OUTSIDE OF WORKING HOURS
August 24, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
DOL Cracks Down on Definition of Independent Contractors
July 15, 2015 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Caveat to the FMLA Final Rule on Same-Sex Spouses: Not Yet
April 14, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
FMLA Final Rule: 'Spouse' Means Same-Sex Spouse (Even in Alabama)
February 24, 2015 | Employee Health Issues, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
FMLA Certifications: When “Unknown” and “Probably” Aren’t Enough
September 15, 2014 | Employee Health Issues, Currents - Employment Law
The Dangers of Employees Taking A “Working Lunch”
January 2, 2014 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Does the DOL’s Letter on Law Students Signal a Broader Acceptance of Intern Arrangements?
September 30, 2013 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Department of Labor Secretary Solis Resigns
January 11, 2013 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
DOL Issues WARN Guidance in Light of Upcoming Sequestration Measures
August 1, 2012 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center