On Thursday evening, March 9, the American Bar Association (ABA) released its much-anticipated evaluation of Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch to the Senate Judiciary Committee. After a thorough and detailed review of the candidate’s temperament, integrity, and overall competence, all 14 members of the ABA’s Standing Committee unanimously rated Gorsuch – currently a judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals – as being “well-qualified,” the highest rating possible. Getting a seal of approval from the ABA, which is often viewed as aligning with more liberal viewpoints, may well be a boost for Gorsuch’s chances of securing the open Supreme Court post created by the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia. The ABA’s vetting process for these ratings involves no small effort, consisting of hundreds of interviews and a thorough review of his legal writings by numerous prominent law school professors and Supreme Court veterans. Gorsuch’s challenge is to garner enough votes to overcome a potential filibuster of Senate Democrats who are still hopping mad about the blockade of former nominee Merrick Garland (who got the same “well-qualified” rating) last year. With the current Republican/Democrat split at 52/48 (the two independents caucus with Democrats) Gorsuch must be able to sway at least eight Democrats (presumably from red states) to break party ranks to reach a filibuster-proof majority of 60. Failing that, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has stated the “nuclear option,” which involves the changing of Senate rules to nix filibusters for Supreme Court nominees, remains a viable path forward, despite his reservations about potential future consequences of diving down such a rabbit hole. Stay tuned, as this whole situation is about to get interesting.
Supreme Court Nominee Gorsuch Receives ABA’s Highest Rating
RELATED ARTICLES
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
No Right, Just Rules: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Steakhouse Managers’ Claims
October 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
ABA Encourages Climate Change Legislation, Adaptation and Mitigating Action
August 20, 2019 | Environmental, Environmental News
Agreement to Arbitrate Acknowledged, Not Accepted, Eighth Circuit Says
July 17, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, High Stakes Employment Issues, Fair Labor Standards Act, Employment Lessons
Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations
July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
No Right, Just Rules: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Steakhouse Managers’ Claims
October 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
ABA Encourages Climate Change Legislation, Adaptation and Mitigating Action
August 20, 2019 | Environmental, Environmental News
Agreement to Arbitrate Acknowledged, Not Accepted, Eighth Circuit Says
July 17, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, High Stakes Employment Issues, Fair Labor Standards Act, Employment Lessons
Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations
July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal
June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Supreme Court Holds Title VII Charge-Filing Is Mandatory but Not Jurisdictional
June 7, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Will There Be An Epic Backlash?
June 27, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Says No To Repeat Class Actions After Statute Of Limitations
June 14, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court is Asked to Answer the Question: What Do You Mean by ‘Sex’?
September 11, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Did a Lower Court Throw Schools an IEP Life Raft?
July 5, 2017 | Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Update on Trump’s Line-Up for DOL and Supreme Court
March 28, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Case Sent Back to Lower Courts by Supreme Court
March 8, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Fifth Circuit Triples Down on the Legality of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
August 15, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Who Knew? U.S. Supreme Court Justices Offer Employment Tips
February 26, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Examines “Supervisor” Definition In Bias Suits
November 27, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
On The Radar: Supreme Court Set to Resolve Circuit Split as to Definition of Supervisor Under Title VII
October 24, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court's Ruling on Healthcare Impacts Employers
June 29, 2012 | Employee Health Issues, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Employment Provision in Arizona Immigration Law
June 27, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Issues Long-Awaited Decision in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
June 18, 2012 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center