On June 9, the Ohio State University Board of Trustees will consider whether to stop allowing employees’ unmarried same-sex partners to obtain health insurance and other benefits. If the board approves the change, then unmarried same-sex partners already enrolled in benefit plans would keep those benefits through 2018, but no new unmarried same-sex partners would be allowed to obtain benefits. This decision is not entirely novel. Miami University made a similar change at the end of 2016, same-sex partners must be married to covered employees in order to obtain benefits. While any move to take away rights from minority groups might at first blush be viewed as discriminatory, further analysis proves this is not so. Ohio State does not offer benefits for unmarried partners of the opposite sex, and the proposed move is an effort to treat all unmarried employees the same. The university traditionally offered benefits to unmarried same-sex partners because same-sex couples were not legally allowed to marry. However, the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision by the U.S. Supreme Court paved the way for legalized same-sex marriages, so there is no continuing need to have different policies to accommodate unmarried same-sex couples. Many businesses have allowed unmarried same-sex partners to obtain health insurance and other benefits under their benefits plans. It remains to be seen whether these businesses – be they state universities like Ohio State and Miami or private companies – will explore changing their policies like Ohio State.
Ohio State University Considers Cutting Benefits for Unmarried Same-Sex Partners
Douglas M. Oldham
Of CounselRELATED ARTICLES
USCIS Agrees to Bundle Adjudications for H-4, L-2, and EAD Applications for Dependents of H-1 and L-1 Visa Holders
February 22, 2023 | Currents - Employment Law
In a Blow to the Transportation Industry, Ninth Circuit Overturns AB 5 Injunction
April 30, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
COVID-19 Leave Plaintiff Denied Discovery of Employer’s Use of PPP Funds
February 26, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues, Employee Leave
Legal Pitfalls and Precautions When Returning to In-Person Events in COVID-19 Era
February 15, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Shortened Limitations Agreements for State Law Claims Remain Viable in Michigan
February 10, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
USCIS Agrees to Bundle Adjudications for H-4, L-2, and EAD Applications for Dependents of H-1 and L-1 Visa Holders
February 22, 2023 | Currents - Employment Law
In a Blow to the Transportation Industry, Ninth Circuit Overturns AB 5 Injunction
April 30, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
COVID-19 Leave Plaintiff Denied Discovery of Employer’s Use of PPP Funds
February 26, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues, Employee Leave
Legal Pitfalls and Precautions When Returning to In-Person Events in COVID-19 Era
February 15, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Shortened Limitations Agreements for State Law Claims Remain Viable in Michigan
February 10, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
California Creates Workers’ Compensation Presumption of Coverage for COVID-19 Illnesses
May 8, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Court Scorches Employer, Upholds Class Arbitration Decision
April 24, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
New CDC Guidance for Critical Workers Returning to Work After Potential COVID-19 Exposure
April 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Salaried-Basis Employees in the World of Temporary COVID-19 Furloughs
April 3, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act, Department of Labor
Are COVID-19 Claims Compensable Under Indiana’s Occupational Disease Act?
March 23, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Illinois Issues COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Order, Excluding Essential Businesses and Operations
March 20, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
New Form I-9 Released by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
February 3, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
New Jersey Bedevils Employers With Five New Pro-Employee Laws
January 24, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
California Federal Court Leaves Retail Employees Holding the Bag
January 21, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Amended Michigan Paid Medical Leave Act in Jeopardy? Stay Tuned
December 27, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Leave
Chicago Workers to Earn $15 Minimum Wage by 2021
December 16, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law
E is for Equal Pay: Pay Data Reporting And The Shifting Meaning Of “Equal Work”
July 5, 2018 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Will There Be An Epic Backlash?
June 27, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Looks to Seventh and Ninth Circuits in Reviving Firefighters Title VII Suit against Union
June 6, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Workplace Culture 2.0: More Leadership, Less Management
May 29, 2018 | Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
The $8 Million Burrito; Or How Not To Conduct Video Surveillance
May 18, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
California Supreme Court Ruling to Give More Workers Employee Status
May 2, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
What’s the EEOC Up To These Days?
January 30, 2018 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Can’t Touch This: Seventh Circuit Panel Backs Tenured Teacher Law
December 13, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Holds That Hearst Interns Are Not Employees
December 12, 2017 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Accommodate Pregnant Employees and Nursing Mothers, or Expect Consequences
November 28, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
The Gradual But Decided Shift to a Much More Complex World of Employment Law
September 29, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Massachusetts Law Latest to Bolster Protection for Pregnant Employees
August 24, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio House Proposes Hurdles to Hiring Process
August 22, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
‘Bona Fide Relationships’ Under Trump’s New Travel Ban: Who’s In and Who’s Out?
June 30, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Lessons Learned – Engaging in Protected Activity Does Not Shield An Employee From Termination
June 9, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio Court Finds New Local Minimum Wage Law Unconstitutional on Technicality
June 8, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Are You Recording This Conversation?
June 5, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Court Invites EEOC’s Opinion on Whether Title VII Prohibits Sexual Orientation Discrimination
June 5, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Trump-Era Immigration Worksite Raid Threats May Bring New Requirements for California Employers
June 2, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Six Statements That May Mean Your Business Will Keep an Employment Lawyer Busy
June 1, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Four Potential Developments for Ohio Employers in the Workers’ Compensation Budget Bill
May 31, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Another Review of the EEOC’s Subpoena for ‘Pedigree Information’
May 30, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Takes Second Look at Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under Title VII
May 26, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Need to Check an Employee’s Criminal Background? Tread Carefully
May 25, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Trump’s Proposed Paid Family Leave
May 24, 2017 | Employee Leave, Currents - Employment Law
Hiring Teenagers This Summer? Here are 3 Key Considerations
May 17, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
House Passes Bill to Legalize Comp Time in the Private Sector
May 8, 2017 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Avoiding the Danegeld (Part 2)
May 5, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Avoiding the Danegeld: Discouraging Me-Too Claims Following a Settlement
May 5, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Trump Promises to Re-tool Travel Ban After Last Week’s Hit from Ninth Circuit
February 17, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC and Hospital Settle Flu Vaccine Religious Accommodation Lawsuit
December 27, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Five Distinctive Things About Ohio and Employment Law
November 10, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
The Importance of Documentation in Defending A Termination Decision
October 24, 2014 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Lets Gay Marriage Stand In Five States
October 7, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
It Depends: The Top 3 Inherently Gray Areas of Employment Law
August 15, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Age Discrimination and Technology: Don’t Take a “Mechanized” Approach
July 3, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
They Know They Have It Too Good
November 21, 2012 | Employee Health Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Minnesota Employers Prohibited From Agreeing to Not Contest Unemployment Benefits
September 7, 2012 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center