The Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) requires an individual to either commence a civil action or file a charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR) within one year after the occurrence of an unlawful discriminatory act. However, that one year time period is suspended when the individual and the employer voluntarily engage in a dispute resolution process. The statute states that a “dispute resolution process” can include arbitration, conciliation, mediation or grievance procedures. Most employers have believed the statute of limitations is tolled only as a result of one of these four processes. That now has changed. In Peterson v. City of Minneapolis, the Minnesota Supreme Court expanded the definition of a dispute resolution process to include an employer’s internal investigation of a complaint of discrimination. In October 2012, Scott Peterson – a police officer – filed a complaint with the City of Minneapolis’ human resources department because he believed he was transferred to a different unit as a result of his age (then 54 years old). Peterson made the internal complaint within one month after the transfer under the city’s Respect in the Workplace Policy. The city conducted an investigation. In January 2013 – more than a year later - the city found the transfer was not because of Peterson’s age. In June 2013, Peterson filed a charge of discrimination with the MDHR. Peterson then withdrew the charge and, in March 2014, filed suit alleging discrimination in violation of the MHRA. The city moved for partial summary judgment and argued that Peterson’s MHRA claim was outside the statute of limitations. Although the district court granted the city’s motion, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed. The Minnesota Supreme Court agreed and found that the district court erred in granting summary judgment. At the outset, the Peterson court examined whether Peterson and the city “voluntarily engaged” in the dispute process. The city argued this did not occur because Peterson could have been required to participate in an interview as part of its investigation of his internal complaint and, therefore, it was not “voluntary”. The court disagreed. According to the court, Peterson chose to file an internal complaint under the policy even though he was not required to do so. As a result, Peterson voluntarily engaged himself in the investigation process, including sitting for a witness interview. The court found this was sufficient under the statute. Next, the court reviewed whether the internal investigation constituted a dispute resolution process. According to the court, the language in the statute for the dispute resolution process provides four examples of what might constitute such process: arbitration, conciliation, mediation or grievance procedures. The court explained the central tenet of these examples is to resolve the dispute. The court proceeded to then examine the city’s policy and found that it was a formal process with the capacity to resolve Peterson’s complaint. The policy outlined the manner in which an employee can file a complaint and the steps the city will take to resolve the issue. The city’s policy also stated it would conduct an inquiry even if the complaint does not want an investigation or any action to be taken. Further, the policy required the city to take appropriate action, including the possible imposition of disciplinary action, after it concluded its investigations. The policy stated that investigations are conducted by an outside department, which the court likened to the use of third-party neutrals similar to those used in arbitrations, conciliations, mediations or grievance procedures. Based on the language of the policy and the processes used by the city in addressing an internal complaint, the court found that the policy possessed the “same formality and ability to resolve disputes as the examples listed in the statute.” Thus, the policy was a “dispute resolution process” under the MHRA. Finally, the court determined that Peterson’s internal complaint of age discrimination involved a claim of unlawful discrimination under the MHRA. As result, the statute of limitations was tolled because the parties voluntarily engaged in the dispute resolution process involving Peterson’s complaint of unlawful discrimination.
Minnesota Human Rights Act’s Statute of Limitations Tolls When Employer Investigates Discrimination Complaints
RELATED ARTICLES
Legal Pitfalls and Precautions When Returning to In-Person Events in COVID-19 Era
February 15, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Shortened Limitations Agreements for State Law Claims Remain Viable in Michigan
February 10, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Preemptive Strike: Employee Files TRO to Avoid Return to Workplace
September 18, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
That’s A Wrap: No Workplace Class Action For California Chipotle Workers
January 28, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Legal Pitfalls and Precautions When Returning to In-Person Events in COVID-19 Era
February 15, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Shortened Limitations Agreements for State Law Claims Remain Viable in Michigan
February 10, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Preemptive Strike: Employee Files TRO to Avoid Return to Workplace
September 18, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
That’s A Wrap: No Workplace Class Action For California Chipotle Workers
January 28, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Indiana Federal Court Gives Frostbitten ADA Plaintiff The Cold Shoulder
November 22, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Sixth Circuit Confirms Standard for 'Regarded As' Discrimination Under the ADA
November 12, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
California Seeks to Sidestep Mandatory Workplace Arbitration Agreements, Again
October 25, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law
Big Changes For Illinois Employers: Workplace Transparency Act
September 24, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct
Navigating Discrimination Claims With Strong Documentation
September 6, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Illinois EPA Amendment Lowers Standard For Discrimination Claims
August 8, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations
July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal
June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Don't Assume That One-Size-Fits-All Employment Policies Work Everywhere
April 5, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct
New Illinois #MeToo Legislation Targets Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
April 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Employment Discrimination
OFCCP Issues New Directive for Analyzing Compensation
September 4, 2018 | Affirmative Action, Currents - Employment Law
Eleventh Circuit Overturns Dismissal of Race-Based Minimum Wage Statute Challenge
July 30, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Holds Full-Time Presence at Work not Essential Simply Because an Employer Says So
July 20, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Says No To Repeat Class Actions After Statute Of Limitations
June 14, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Looks to Seventh and Ninth Circuits in Reviving Firefighters Title VII Suit against Union
June 6, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
In a Culture of Inclusiveness, Don’t Overlook Age
June 1, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Simple Reminders For Developing Healthy Workplace Culture
May 31, 2018 | Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Letter C: Co-Workers With Criminal Records? Your Workforce May Be More Open-Minded Than You Think
May 24, 2018 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
B is for “Bias” - Is Bias The Not-So-New Cause of Discrimination?
April 24, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Holds Transgender Status Protected Under Title VII
March 12, 2018 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio Bill Protecting LGBTQ Rights Receives Widespread Support at Committee Hearing
February 8, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Nursing Mothers Protected under Discrimination Laws, says Connecticut Federal Court
December 28, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Complaint Inquiries Now a Click Away With New Public Portal
November 3, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Attention, Class: Seventh Circuit Finds Preferred Teaching Methods Not Protected Activity Under ADA and Section 504
October 31, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Will Ohio Pass a Law to Protect LGBTQ Rights?
October 3, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court is Asked to Answer the Question: What Do You Mean by ‘Sex’?
September 11, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Don’t Get Caught in the Weeds: Hiring Issues and Medical Marijuana
August 21, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Court Invites EEOC’s Opinion on Whether Title VII Prohibits Sexual Orientation Discrimination
June 5, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Takes Second Look at Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under Title VII
May 26, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio House Takes Steps to Modernize Outdated Antidiscrimination Statutes
May 23, 2017 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Avoiding the Danegeld: Discouraging Me-Too Claims Following a Settlement
May 5, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Lessons Learned: Job Descriptions Do Matter
May 1, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Court Tells Skydiver’s Estate It Won’t Reconsider Title VII Claim
April 19, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Suspending Employee Who Hit Boss With Vehicle Not Retaliation
April 11, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Does Same-Sex Harassment Support Gender Discrimination Claims? Texas Supreme Court to Decide
March 17, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Mugshots Gone Viral: Internet Clickbait is a Hiring Manager’s Minefield
March 16, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Case Sent Back to Lower Courts by Supreme Court
March 8, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Charge-d Atmosphere: A Few Pointers When a Current Employee Files a Charge
February 21, 2017 | EEOC, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Blog Update: North Carolina Business that Fired Pregnant Employee Agrees to Three-Year Consent Decree with EEOC
February 13, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
2016: EEOC Charges Keep Climbing
February 8, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Litigation Battle Over Minneapolis Sick Leave Ordinance
December 12, 2016 | Employee Leave, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Issues New Guidelines on National Origin Discrimination
November 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit Discards Well-Worn Standard for Discrimination Cases
August 29, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Ray of Hope Peeks Through a Mound of Proposed EEOC Data Requirements: Senators Fight to Nix EEOC Plan
August 25, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Minneapolis Employers Brace for Paid Sick Leave
June 24, 2016 | Employee Health Issues, Currents - Employment Law
OSHA’s New Mandatory Electronic Recordkeeping Rule
June 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Smorgasbord of Termination Reasons That Might Be Used Against You
May 13, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Access Addressed in New EEOC Fact Sheet
May 6, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A RIFing Yarn: How Being Able to Support a RIF Pays Off Down the Road
April 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Benefits of Adopting an Effective Complaint-Reporting Procedure
April 22, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Court Says Mandatory Flu Vaccine for Hospital Worker Does Not Violate Title VII
April 18, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Don’t Call a Transgender Employee “It”
April 6, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Federal Court Allows ADEA “Pattern-or-Practice” Claim to Proceed
November 23, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
DO IT FOR THE VINE! How This Week’s Viral Social Media Trend Can Spark Legal Liability in the Workplace
November 11, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Clarifies Viability of Retaliation Claim Under Section 1983 For Having Complained of Discrimination
September 4, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Not All Good Deeds Are Punished: A Paid Suspension Is Not An Adverse Employment Action For Title VII
August 19, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
More Hope for Employers Who Have Ever Felt Bullied by the EEOC
July 1, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Do Not Seek DNA Information From Employees…
June 19, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Zoo Fires Employee For Social Media Comment About Serving “Rude A** White People”
June 18, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Targets Minnesota Company For Alleged Transgender Discrimination
June 17, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Unanimity and Clarity: U.S. Supreme Court Outlines Standards for Judicial Review of EEOC Conciliation
April 29, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court to Provide Guidance on Constructive Discharge Statute of Limitations Period
April 29, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
No Girls Allowed Isn’t Allowed: Even Roughnecks Have To Follow The Law
April 1, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Saks Settles Controversial Transgender Discrimination Case
March 9, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Man Claiming Hand Scanning Time Clock Causes “Mark of the Beast” Wins Religious Discrimination Suit
January 23, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Hope For Employers: Some Courts Are Requiring The EEOC To Thoroughly Investigate Allegations Before Siding With Employees
January 15, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Recent Case In Michigan Highlights Increased Focus On Transgender Discrimination
November 7, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Watch Your Language in the Workplace: Timeless Challenge for Employers
October 3, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC SUES TWO EMPLOYERS FOR TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATION
September 30, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Reminder: Pregnant Employees are a Protected Class
September 18, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Employee Evaluation Practices Under Scrutiny
August 1, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Workplace Bullying may Amount to Actionable Discrimination
February 27, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
“Using Social Media to Discriminate”: Please Read the Fine Print
December 2, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Breaking - Mixed Bag Ruling In California Mixed Motive Case
February 8, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Cannot Claim “Deliberative Process Privilege” To Preclude Investigator’s Deposition
July 25, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Expands on "Cat's Paw" Discrimination
July 16, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Complaints Need Not Include Facts Which Would Support a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination under McDonnell Douglas
July 5, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Finds that Transgender Workers Are Protected by Title VII
June 4, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center