During the last few years, employers have taken comfort in a slew of court decisions that have held – in some form or another – that an arbitration agreement can waive the right to bring a class or collective action. For example, in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court found that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempted state law – and specifically California law – which had expressly prohibited class action waivers. The Supreme Court recently cemented that ruling in DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 2015 WL 8546242 (2015), where it again upheld a contractual class action waiver as enforceable under the FAA. Of course, most of these recent decisions involved commercial disputes – not a dispute between an employer and an employee. While the Supreme Court has been issuing rulings favorable to the commercial side of class action arbitration, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been working in the opposite direction. The board has issued multiple decisions unreservedly holding that class and collective action arbitration waivers violate an employee’s rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), and particularly rights under by Section 7 of the act, which protects employees engaging in concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. While some courts have accepted the NLRB’s reasoning to strike down class action waivers, many others have not. The Seventh Circuit’s recent decision in Lewis v. Epic Systems Corp. 2016 WL 3029464 (7th Cir. May 26, 2016), squarely sides with the NLRB’s interpretation invalidating class and collective action arbitration waivers. The agreement in Lewis was fairly typical: employees were contractually obligated to arbitrate all employment-related disputes, and they expressly waived “the right to participate in or receive money or any other relief from any class, collective or representative proceeding.” The case involved an employee who filed a lawsuit for unpaid overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state law. The employer asked the court to compel arbitration under the parties’ agreement. The employee argued the arbitration provision was unenforceable because it interfered with employee’s rights to engage in protected concerted activities. The district court agreed with the employee and denied the motion to arbitrate. The employer appealed. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit sided with the employee and affirmed the underlying decision denying the motion to compel arbitration. The court agreed that the class and collective action arbitration waiver language was unenforceable, finding that it “runs straight into the teeth of Section 7.” The court explained that an employee’s ability to pursue claims on a class or collective basis constituted “concerted activity” under the act, and that prohibiting employees from pursuing such claims was unenforceable and illegal. The court rejected the notion that the ability to file class and collective actions was merely a procedural right, finding that it was substantive and “lies at the heart of the restructuring of employer/employee relationships that Congress meant to achieve in the statute.” The court also rejected the claim that its conclusion was inconsistent with the FAA, noting that it was unclear whether “the FAA has anything to do with the case.” In the court’s view, the FAA does not protect arbitration agreements under circumstances where law or equity would revoke a contract – which is the case with a class action arbitration waiver that violates Section 7 rights. The Seventh Circuit staked out territory directly at odds with a decision from the Fifth Circuit, D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB, 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), which upheld a class action waiver in the face of a Section 7 challenge by the NLRB. Aside from the Fifth Circuit, the Seventh Circuit’s decision also may run counter to comparable rulings from the Second, Eighth and Ninth Circuits (although the Seventh Circuit took pains to note that there was no direct conflict with any of those cases). Nevertheless, it appears the Supreme Court eventually will need to address this matter and resolve the conflict among the circuit courts on the enforceability of class and collective action arbitration waivers. In the meantime, employers who rely on arbitration to resolve employment disputes should be cautious about class or collective action waivers in their arbitration agreements that would be impacted by the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Lewis. Language barring an employee from pursuing a class or collective action could significantly impair an employer’s ability to enforce arbitration.
The Seventh Circuit Rejects Class & Collective Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements
Hannesson Murphy
PartnerRELATED ARTICLES
Supreme Court Limits Federal Court’s Ability to Modify, Vacate, and Confirm Arbitration Awards
April 5, 2022 | Currents - Employment Law, Letter of the Law
Can You Have Confidentiality Requirements In Mandatory Arbitration Pacts?
February 1, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
Shut Your Mouth: Policy Prohibiting Bad-Mouthing the Company Ruled Unlawful
August 27, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
No FLSA Friend Requests: Employees With Arbitration Agreements Can’t Get Notice
January 29, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
U.S. Supreme Court to Take Up Independent Contractor Arbitration Case
February 28, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Limits Federal Court’s Ability to Modify, Vacate, and Confirm Arbitration Awards
April 5, 2022 | Currents - Employment Law, Letter of the Law
Can You Have Confidentiality Requirements In Mandatory Arbitration Pacts?
February 1, 2022 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
Shut Your Mouth: Policy Prohibiting Bad-Mouthing the Company Ruled Unlawful
August 27, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
No FLSA Friend Requests: Employees With Arbitration Agreements Can’t Get Notice
January 29, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
U.S. Supreme Court to Take Up Independent Contractor Arbitration Case
February 28, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Sticks and Stones: When Texts and Emails Will Hurt You
July 18, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Are You Recording This Conversation?
June 5, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
The World According to Trump: Could the Obama NLRB’s Pro-Union Rulings be Undone?
November 17, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
The World According to Trump: Trump’s Impact on Traditional Labor
November 15, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Arbitration Agreement Enforced Based on Continued Employment
October 28, 2016 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Fifth Circuit Triples Down on the Legality of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
August 15, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Hits Ceiling in Continual Push to Expand Scope of Protected Concerted Activity
July 5, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Critical of NLRB’s Investigation Confidentiality Concerns
June 23, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Once Again Puts Employers on Notice Regarding Handbook Policies
October 27, 2015 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Are Your Employees Religious Enough For The NLRB?
August 31, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Challenge to NLRB “Ambush Election Rules” Fails
July 31, 2015 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
A Reminder from the NLRB to Scrutinize Your &!^@$) Policies
May 26, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
THE SEC JOINS THE NLRB IN ATTACKING EMPLOYEE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS
April 17, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Shows No Signs of Releasing Its Death Grip on Employer Handbooks
March 26, 2015 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Non-Union Employers Beware – The NLRB May Come Knocking On Your Door
March 20, 2015 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
The Year in Social Media: Four Big Developments from 2014
December 29, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB “Likes” Employees’ Facebook Argument
September 2, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Declines to Appeal Class Action Waivers to Supreme Court: What Does it Mean for Employers?
July 21, 2014 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Outlier…or NLRB Shift on Social Media Policies?
July 7, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Fifth Circuit Denies NLRB’s Rehearing Request on Class Action Waivers; NLRB Likely to Continue Ignoring Fifth (and Other) Circuit Court Rulings
April 21, 2014 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Not April Foolin’: National Labor Relations Board Finds Employer Rule Requiring Positivity and Professionalism Unlawful
April 7, 2014 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB "Gives Up the Ghost" On Posting Rule Fight
January 9, 2014 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Rule Against Non-Union Workplace “Disruptions” Can Run Afoul of NLRA
October 28, 2013 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Offers Further Clarification Regarding Expression of Employees’ Section 7 Rights on Social Media
May 23, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Congress Rejects Password Protection Amendment To CISPA
April 24, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
8th Circuit Upholds Class Waivers in FLSA Cases
January 9, 2013 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Even When You Win, You Might Still Lose: NLRB Strikes Back After Employer Prevails In Federal Court
October 10, 2012 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Social Media Decisions Leave Questions for Employers
October 4, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
The NLRB, EEOC and Social Media
September 4, 2012 | Pregnancy, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Issues Long-Awaited Decision in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
June 18, 2012 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
A Complete Overview of the NLRB’s Memorandum Regarding Social Media Policies in the Workplace
June 4, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center