Late last week, the often employer-friendly Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals tossed out the basis upon which discrimination claims have been analyzed for almost a generation. The decision, Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises (Case No. 15-2574), foreshadows dramatic and huge repercussions for employers in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin. Background on Direct and Indirect Tests For more than 20 years, courts in the Seventh Circuit have recognized two avenues of proving discrimination: the direct and indirect methods. Before last week, a plaintiff-employee in the Seventh Circuit could prove discrimination under the “direct method” by presenting “direct” evidence of discrimination, or by presenting circumstantial (i.e. “indirect”) evidence – such as fashioning a “convincing mosaic” by which a jury could infer intentional discrimination by the decisionmaker. Alternatively, a plaintiff-employee could try to proceed under the “indirect method,” which was based on the familiar burden-shifting analysis originated by the U.S. Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). Confused? So was the Seventh Circuit, which has spent years trying to wrangle these various tests – becoming increasingly frustrated with the legal jujitsu required to navigate them. Over time, lawyers used the varying methodologies as needed to advance the best interests of their clients. For example, employers often succeeded in demonstrating an employees’ failure to comport with the requirements of the various tests. Ultimately, the issue came to a head in Ortiz – resulting in the Seventh Circuit tossing the whole whack-a-mole procedure overboard. Indeed, the court is so completely soured on the use of “convincing mosaic” as a legal standard that the judges never want to see it again; vowing that any decision based on that phrase will be subject to summary reversal. The Ortiz Opinion The issue lying at the heart of Ortiz is that the various methods sorted evidence into different piles, which then were evaluated by different standards. As an example, the plaintiff in Ortiz claimed he was fired because of his Mexican ethnicity. Among other evidence, he pointed to various ethnic slurs against him during his employment. Applying the old standards of direct and indirect evidence, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer. It noted, for example, that the employee had not built a “convincing mosaic” of evidence, because the alleged racial slurs were not connected to the plaintiff’s discharge. The Seventh Circuit reversed the district court’s denial of summary judgment and sent the case back for trial. In doing so, it made clear that “evidence is evidence:” from the court’s perspective, all of the evidence should be evaluated together in a unified inquiry – a process that it regarded as fully consistent with the standards of McDonnell Douglas. In tossing out the direct/indirect methodology, the Court reiterated the fundamental standard: “whether the evidence would permit a reasonable factfinder to conclude that the plaintiff’s race, ethnicity, sex, religion, or other proscribed factor caused the discharge or other adverse employment action.” In other words, evidence of discrimination must be considered as a whole and no longer can be compartmentalized or evaluated by different standards. So for employers who’ve been puzzled by their lawyers talking in terms of direct and indirect methods and evidence, those distinctions have been erased by the Seventh Circuit. The trouble is that those distinctions oftentimes helped employers get out of cases early and avoid trial. Now, evidence that previously might not have been considered by a court (such as comments disconnected from an adverse employment action) may be tossed into the mix – raising the stakes for employers. While the full impact of the decision is unclear, there is no doubt that Ortiz is a game-changer within the Seventh Circuit, and that it may be more difficult in the future for employers to successfully obtain summary judgment.
RELATED ARTICLES
Legal Pitfalls and Precautions When Returning to In-Person Events in COVID-19 Era
February 15, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Preemptive Strike: Employee Files TRO to Avoid Return to Workplace
September 18, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
That’s A Wrap: No Workplace Class Action For California Chipotle Workers
January 28, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Indiana Federal Court Gives Frostbitten ADA Plaintiff The Cold Shoulder
November 22, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Legal Pitfalls and Precautions When Returning to In-Person Events in COVID-19 Era
February 15, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Preemptive Strike: Employee Files TRO to Avoid Return to Workplace
September 18, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
That’s A Wrap: No Workplace Class Action For California Chipotle Workers
January 28, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Indiana Federal Court Gives Frostbitten ADA Plaintiff The Cold Shoulder
November 22, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Sixth Circuit Confirms Standard for 'Regarded As' Discrimination Under the ADA
November 12, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Big Changes For Illinois Employers: Workplace Transparency Act
September 24, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct
Navigating Discrimination Claims With Strong Documentation
September 6, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Illinois EPA Amendment Lowers Standard For Discrimination Claims
August 8, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations
July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal
June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Don't Assume That One-Size-Fits-All Employment Policies Work Everywhere
April 5, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct
New Illinois #MeToo Legislation Targets Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
April 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Employment Discrimination
OFCCP Issues New Directive for Analyzing Compensation
September 4, 2018 | Affirmative Action, Currents - Employment Law
Eleventh Circuit Overturns Dismissal of Race-Based Minimum Wage Statute Challenge
July 30, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Holds Full-Time Presence at Work not Essential Simply Because an Employer Says So
July 20, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Looks to Seventh and Ninth Circuits in Reviving Firefighters Title VII Suit against Union
June 6, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
In a Culture of Inclusiveness, Don’t Overlook Age
June 1, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Simple Reminders For Developing Healthy Workplace Culture
May 31, 2018 | Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Letter C: Co-Workers With Criminal Records? Your Workforce May Be More Open-Minded Than You Think
May 24, 2018 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
B is for “Bias” - Is Bias The Not-So-New Cause of Discrimination?
April 24, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Holds Transgender Status Protected Under Title VII
March 12, 2018 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio Bill Protecting LGBTQ Rights Receives Widespread Support at Committee Hearing
February 8, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Nursing Mothers Protected under Discrimination Laws, says Connecticut Federal Court
December 28, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Complaint Inquiries Now a Click Away With New Public Portal
November 3, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Attention, Class: Seventh Circuit Finds Preferred Teaching Methods Not Protected Activity Under ADA and Section 504
October 31, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Will Ohio Pass a Law to Protect LGBTQ Rights?
October 3, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court is Asked to Answer the Question: What Do You Mean by ‘Sex’?
September 11, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Don’t Get Caught in the Weeds: Hiring Issues and Medical Marijuana
August 21, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Court Invites EEOC’s Opinion on Whether Title VII Prohibits Sexual Orientation Discrimination
June 5, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Takes Second Look at Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under Title VII
May 26, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio House Takes Steps to Modernize Outdated Antidiscrimination Statutes
May 23, 2017 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Avoiding the Danegeld: Discouraging Me-Too Claims Following a Settlement
May 5, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Lessons Learned: Job Descriptions Do Matter
May 1, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Court Tells Skydiver’s Estate It Won’t Reconsider Title VII Claim
April 19, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Minnesota Human Rights Act’s Statute of Limitations Tolls When Employer Investigates Discrimination Complaints
April 13, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Suspending Employee Who Hit Boss With Vehicle Not Retaliation
April 11, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Does Same-Sex Harassment Support Gender Discrimination Claims? Texas Supreme Court to Decide
March 17, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Mugshots Gone Viral: Internet Clickbait is a Hiring Manager’s Minefield
March 16, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Case Sent Back to Lower Courts by Supreme Court
March 8, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Charge-d Atmosphere: A Few Pointers When a Current Employee Files a Charge
February 21, 2017 | EEOC, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Blog Update: North Carolina Business that Fired Pregnant Employee Agrees to Three-Year Consent Decree with EEOC
February 13, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
2016: EEOC Charges Keep Climbing
February 8, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Issues New Guidelines on National Origin Discrimination
November 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Ray of Hope Peeks Through a Mound of Proposed EEOC Data Requirements: Senators Fight to Nix EEOC Plan
August 25, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
OSHA’s New Mandatory Electronic Recordkeeping Rule
June 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Smorgasbord of Termination Reasons That Might Be Used Against You
May 13, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Access Addressed in New EEOC Fact Sheet
May 6, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A RIFing Yarn: How Being Able to Support a RIF Pays Off Down the Road
April 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Benefits of Adopting an Effective Complaint-Reporting Procedure
April 22, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Court Says Mandatory Flu Vaccine for Hospital Worker Does Not Violate Title VII
April 18, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Don’t Call a Transgender Employee “It”
April 6, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Federal Court Allows ADEA “Pattern-or-Practice” Claim to Proceed
November 23, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
DO IT FOR THE VINE! How This Week’s Viral Social Media Trend Can Spark Legal Liability in the Workplace
November 11, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Clarifies Viability of Retaliation Claim Under Section 1983 For Having Complained of Discrimination
September 4, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Not All Good Deeds Are Punished: A Paid Suspension Is Not An Adverse Employment Action For Title VII
August 19, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
More Hope for Employers Who Have Ever Felt Bullied by the EEOC
July 1, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Do Not Seek DNA Information From Employees…
June 19, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Zoo Fires Employee For Social Media Comment About Serving “Rude A** White People”
June 18, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Targets Minnesota Company For Alleged Transgender Discrimination
June 17, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Unanimity and Clarity: U.S. Supreme Court Outlines Standards for Judicial Review of EEOC Conciliation
April 29, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court to Provide Guidance on Constructive Discharge Statute of Limitations Period
April 29, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
No Girls Allowed Isn’t Allowed: Even Roughnecks Have To Follow The Law
April 1, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Saks Settles Controversial Transgender Discrimination Case
March 9, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Man Claiming Hand Scanning Time Clock Causes “Mark of the Beast” Wins Religious Discrimination Suit
January 23, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Hope For Employers: Some Courts Are Requiring The EEOC To Thoroughly Investigate Allegations Before Siding With Employees
January 15, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Recent Case In Michigan Highlights Increased Focus On Transgender Discrimination
November 7, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Watch Your Language in the Workplace: Timeless Challenge for Employers
October 3, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC SUES TWO EMPLOYERS FOR TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATION
September 30, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Reminder: Pregnant Employees are a Protected Class
September 18, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Employee Evaluation Practices Under Scrutiny
August 1, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Workplace Bullying may Amount to Actionable Discrimination
February 27, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
“Using Social Media to Discriminate”: Please Read the Fine Print
December 2, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Breaking - Mixed Bag Ruling In California Mixed Motive Case
February 8, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Cannot Claim “Deliberative Process Privilege” To Preclude Investigator’s Deposition
July 25, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Expands on "Cat's Paw" Discrimination
July 16, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Complaints Need Not Include Facts Which Would Support a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination under McDonnell Douglas
July 5, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Finds that Transgender Workers Are Protected by Title VII
June 4, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center