It has long been argued by many detractors that gentlemen’s clubs objectify women. A group of exotic dancers in Philadelphia has gone a step further and argued that their employer has objectified them as workers by failing to treat them as employees and failing to pay them the minimum wages to which they are entitled. A class of approximately 75 exotic dancers has sued The Penthouse Club under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claiming they were wrongly classified as independent contractors and were not paid minimum wage – or any wage at all. The class of dancers claims they were treated as independent contractors and that they worked solely for tips from customers without any wages. However, the women state they were not contractors and were subject to the FLSA’s minimum wage. They claim the club controlled all aspects of their job duties, making them employees and not independent contractors, as they were not “independent.” Specifically, the club controlled the dancers’ schedules, strictly enforced employment rules, and regularly fined and disciplined dancers if they violated the rules. If found liable, the club could be liable for several years of back wages at the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for each plaintiff, plus an equal amount in liquidated damages, as well as attorneys’ fees, costs and interest. Such damages can be staggering, as similar actions have seen millions awarded to employees improperly classified as independent contractors. Additionally, the club could be liable for unpaid federal employment taxes, plus interest. Whether they operate gentlemen’s clubs or other businesses, employers should be mindful of the obligation to pay employees consistently with the Fair Labor Standards Act and that there are important differences between employees and independent contractors under the law. The case at hand is Diaz v. 3001 Castor, Inc., No. 16-cv-05645 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
RELATED ARTICLES
In a Blow to the Transportation Industry, Ninth Circuit Overturns AB 5 Injunction
April 30, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
COVID-19 Class Action Litigation Heats Up Over Temperature Checks
October 30, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
California Adopts New Exemptions from AB 5 Independent Contractor Classification
September 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Motorin’: CAFA Removal Upheld, California Wage and Hour Class Action Dismissed
August 26, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Employment Lessons
Outbreak of COVID-19 Public Nuisance Cases Continues
August 7, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
In a Blow to the Transportation Industry, Ninth Circuit Overturns AB 5 Injunction
April 30, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
COVID-19 Class Action Litigation Heats Up Over Temperature Checks
October 30, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
California Adopts New Exemptions from AB 5 Independent Contractor Classification
September 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Motorin’: CAFA Removal Upheld, California Wage and Hour Class Action Dismissed
August 26, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Employment Lessons
Outbreak of COVID-19 Public Nuisance Cases Continues
August 7, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Welcome to the Hotel COVID Lockdown – Seafood Employees Allege Failure to Pay and False Imprisonment
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Public Nuisance Claims Emerge In COVID-19 Workplace Litigation Filings
June 19, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
COVID-19 Related Workplace Litigation Picks Up Steam
June 12, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Illinois Federal Court Rejects Arbitration of BIPA Class Action
June 10, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Brain Freeze: California Federal Court Rejects Ice Cream Shop’s CAFA Removal
May 29, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit Confirms Article III Standing for BIPA Plaintiffs
May 7, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Shutting the Gate: Temporary Worker Excluded From FLSA Collective Action
April 23, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
Third-Party Biometric Timekeeping Provider Chops Down BIPA Liability
April 14, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
That’s A Wrap: No Workplace Class Action For California Chipotle Workers
January 28, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
New Jersey Bedevils Employers With Five New Pro-Employee Laws
January 24, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
California Federal Court Leaves Retail Employees Holding the Bag
January 21, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Motor Carriers Continue to Roll Over AB 5
January 17, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Third Circuit Schools District Court on Workplace Class Certification
January 8, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Court Pumps Brakes on California AB 5 as Applied to Motor Carriers
January 2, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Class Arbitrability is a Decision for the Court, Not the Arbitrator
July 24, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, High Stakes Employment Issues
California Court Determines Gig-Economy Drivers Are Independent Contractors
February 13, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Lesson: Don’t Underestimate Court’s Ability to Change Its Mind
April 6, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Federal Lawsuit Over Mass Layoffs Not on the Menu for California Restaurant Group
February 27, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
The Battle Is Joined: Two New Entrants in the Fight Over New Overtime Rules
September 21, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Oklahoma and U.S. DOL Agree to Tag-Team Worker Misclassification Initiatives
September 16, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Employee Misclassification as Independent Contractor
September 12, 2016 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Wage Wars: The Plaintiff’s Bar Awakens
December 4, 2015 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Lyft is Facing the Ride of Its Life
March 13, 2015 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Uber Argues That Its Drivers Are Not Employees
December 18, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Collective and Class Actions: Interns, Assistant Managers – and their Lawyers!
July 18, 2014 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Top Tech Companies Headed to Trial in Talent Poaching Conspiracy Case
April 10, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Contractor Misclassification Is Back On The Agenda
November 20, 2013 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Counts Paid Volunteers As Employees Under the FMLA
August 21, 2013 | Employee Health Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Rules that Class Action Waivers are Allowed Under the FLSA
August 15, 2013 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Straying from Past Practice in Investigation Raises Retaliation Risk
July 19, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Employers Must Take Care to Avoid Individual Liability Under the FLSA
July 12, 2013 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
What Judges Really Want: Reasonable Litigants
June 6, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Losing A Fair Labor Standards Act Lawsuit Can Be Costly
November 8, 2012 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit Sides With Defendants On Eavesdropping Case
October 18, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Federal Court In Washington Rules That Sales Agent Is A Contractor, Not An Employee
September 28, 2012 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center