Instances of deplorable racism have sparked recent protests on the University of Missouri’s campus. Not surprisingly, these protests have received a significant amount of media attention. On Nov. 13, 2015, however, the world’s attention shifted to the horrific terrorist attacks in Paris. We have since been inundated with 24-hour news coverage on developments related to the war on terror. Following the Paris attacks, the Washington Times released a story explaining how University of Missouri protestors had taken to Twitter to express disappointment with the fact that this tragedy was directing media attention away from their cause. College student Emily Faz, an employee of Wild Wing Café, apparently found this development unsettling. So what did she do? Faz took to Facebook to disseminate her opinion regarding the Washington Times article. Here is the content of her post: I’m just going to leave this here. I swear if I see this B* at Southern, I’ll make you regret even knowing what a movement or a hashtag is, and you’ll walk away with your tail tucked. This whole black lives matter movement is misguided and out of hand. Maybe no one likes or takes y’all seriously because no one can see past your egotistical B*******. Some people might just look past it, but fair warning I’m am (sic) not one. All lives matter, that has always been the case, and you are part of the problem if you think other wise (sic).
Faz’s controversial post didn’t just go viral: it created a social media firestorm. Thousands of individuals took to Facebook and Twitter to condemn Faz’s commentary. Despite the criticism, a large number of supporters rushed to Faz’s defense. Many supporters claimed Faz was the target of a social media “witch hunt.” In their subjective view, Faz had done nothing more than share her opinion on a controversial subject. Nevertheless, she was being made the target of a significant amount of online harassment. The ongoing debate intensified when the Internet turned its attention to Wild Wing Café. The business started receiving messages calling for Faz’s termination. The attention also unquestionably disrupted the company’s business operations. What happened next? Rumors started to circulate that Wild Wing Café had terminated Faz’s employment. So Faz’s supporters took to Twitter to protest the company’s decision. The rumor was incorrect. The company did not terminate Faz’s employment and ultimately issued a statement to set the story straight. Will Faz remain employed by Wild Wing Café? We don’t know. And that is not really the focus of this blog post. The issue we would like employers to focus on is this: A controversial Facebook post sparked a social media frenzy that unquestionably impacted this employer’s day-to-day operations. The Big Picture Faz’s Facebook post provides a vivid example of how an employee’s social media activity can have a very real impact in the workplace. This raises an important question: What should an employer do if an employee’s social media post goes viral and negatively impacts business operations? Well, for starters, avoid the knee jerk reaction. Take a step back and evaluate the content of the post. For example, does it violate the company’s EEO policy? Does it provide evidence of a discriminatory animus? Examining social media content from this angle is critical to making an informed decision. Additionally, consider whether the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) will have an impact on your analysis. The NLRA provides some protection to employees engaging in social media activity when the content amounts to “protected concerted activity.” This occurs when two or more employees take action for their mutual aid or protection regarding the terms and conditions of employment (e.g., wages, hours, safety, etc.). For example, a social media controversy created by a group of employees complaining about wages may fall within the scope of “protected concerted activity.” As such, examining the social media content from this angle is also critical to making an informed decision. Moreover, if an employer is leaning towards termination, evaluate whether the company may be setting itself up for a lawsuit. For example, has the company allowed controversial posts in the past? Will the employee be able to point to similarly situated individuals who received more favorable treatment? This is yet another angle an employer will have to consider in order to formulate a game plan. What’s the bottom line? It’s all about assessing risk. And properly assessing risk will involve a careful analysis of the facts specific to each case. Employers are therefore encouraged to involve outside counsel when navigating this minefield. One final note: We’ve repeatedly emphasized that it is critical for employers to monitor what is trending on the Internet. The debate regarding Faz’s social media activity only serves to underscore this point. To be sure, keeping up on what is trending probably won’t stop a controversial social media post from going viral,but it may provide an employer with more lead time to formulate a game plan. Read related posts: Trending Now: How the Latest News Going Viral Can Lead to Employment Litigation Twitter is Going Crazy Over the #InternationalMensDay Hashtag Employee Suspended for Tweet: What We Can Learn From This Real World ExampleThe Viral Spiral: How An Employee’s Facebook Post Dragged Her Employer Into A Social Media Controversy
RELATED ARTICLES
Shut Your Mouth: Policy Prohibiting Bad-Mouthing the Company Ruled Unlawful
August 27, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
Asking: “How much do you currently make?” in 2018?
December 29, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Can Employers Terminate an Employee Because of Vacation Photos Posted to Facebook?
April 28, 2017 | Employee Leave, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Using an Employee’s Social Media Posts to Prove Laziness? Think Again
November 21, 2016 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Employers Need Not Tolerate Workers Screaming On the Electronic Street Corner
June 6, 2016 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Shut Your Mouth: Policy Prohibiting Bad-Mouthing the Company Ruled Unlawful
August 27, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
Asking: “How much do you currently make?” in 2018?
December 29, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Can Employers Terminate an Employee Because of Vacation Photos Posted to Facebook?
April 28, 2017 | Employee Leave, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Using an Employee’s Social Media Posts to Prove Laziness? Think Again
November 21, 2016 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Employers Need Not Tolerate Workers Screaming On the Electronic Street Corner
June 6, 2016 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
EMPLOYERS: The #ElderlyChristmasSongs Hashtag Is Trending On Twitter
December 9, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
EMOJI-GOSH! How Emojis in Workplace Communications Can Spark A Lawsuit (Or Make It Harder To Defend One)
November 20, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Employee Suspended For Tweet: What We Can Learn From This Real World Example
November 20, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Employers: Twitter is Going Crazy Over The #InternationalMensDay Hashtag
November 19, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Trending Now: How the Latest News Going Viral Can Lead to Employment Litigation
November 17, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
DO IT FOR THE VINE! How This Week’s Viral Social Media Trend Can Spark Legal Liability in the Workplace
November 11, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Employee Fired for Facebook Selfie
October 19, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Employers Won’t “Like” Ruling Allowing Class Action Notifications via Social Media
May 6, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Breaking News: Employees Are Still Posting Inappropriate Content On Facebook. So Let’s Just Learn From Their Lack of Judgment
May 1, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
The Tweet Heard Round the World
February 10, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
This Message Will Self Destruct in 10 Seconds: Snapchat, Confide and the Implications of Disappearing Content on Your Business
February 9, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
The Year in Social Media: Four Big Developments from 2014
December 29, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Avoid Going From Ho! Ho! Ho! To Oh No! No! No!
December 23, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB “Likes” Employees’ Facebook Argument
September 2, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC turns its focus to the impact of social media in employment litigation
March 20, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Illinois Case Reminds (Again): Document Rights and Responsibilities On Company Social Media Accounts
March 10, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
How much can a Facebook post cost you? About $80K
February 27, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Wisconsin Likely to Limit Access to Social Media Accounts
February 21, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Academic Studies About Screening Applicants’ Social Media: New Cottage Industry?
January 15, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Facebook Background Checking: Shouldn’t Smart Applicants Check Their Privacy Settings?
January 8, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
“Using Social Media to Discriminate”: Please Read the Fine Print
December 2, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Facebook Users Beware: Even Posts You Claim Not to Have Written Can Haunt You
October 29, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Your Facebook “Like” May Be Constitutionally-Protected Speech
September 27, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Social Media Policy Provides Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Reason for Termination
September 25, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Employers May Inadvertently Break the Law When They Discipline Employees for Facebook “Wall” Posts
August 30, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
NLRB Offers Further Clarification Regarding Expression of Employees’ Section 7 Rights on Social Media
May 23, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Gov. Christie The First to Stand Up to Social Media Legislation Wave?
May 13, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Three States Pass Legislation on Limiting Access to Social Medial Passwords
May 3, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Congress Rejects Password Protection Amendment To CISPA
April 24, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Washington State Legislators Withdraw Bill Allowing Employers to Access Social Media Accounts During Investigations
April 11, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
What Happens on Facebook Stays on Facebook…Or Else
April 3, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Texas Legislature Will Consider Employers’ Ability to Access Social Media Passwords
January 7, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
When Is Facebook Activity "Solicitation?"
November 26, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Hand it Over: Federal Judge Orders Plaintiffs in Discrimination Lawsuit to Produce Cell Phones and Facebook Account Passwords
November 21, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
California Passes Law to Regulate Access to Employees’ Social Media Accounts
October 4, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Follow Us On Twitter!
September 6, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
The NLRB, EEOC and Social Media
September 4, 2012 | Pregnancy, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Entertainers, Facebook Messages and the Work-Product Doctrine?
May 22, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center