Consider the following scenario: Sharon is the owner of a very successful restaurant in Florida. Sharon’s establishment employs around 20 individuals. Most of her employees are between 18 and 22 years old. In May 2015, Sharon hired Joseph as a server. Joseph is a disabled 38 year old whose medical condition requires that he wear special orthopedic shoes. Sharon began noticing an annoying pattern of behavior during the first week of July. Several of her younger employees working in the back stock-room would frequently exclaim: “WHAT ARE THOSE?!?!” – before bursting into laughter. Sharon did not understand the humor, but suspected it was nothing more than an inside joke. Sharon simply shrugged it off and went about her business. In mid-July Sharon was leafing through a stack of paperwork when she came across a mysterious envelope. Sharon opened the envelope and discovered a handwritten message from Joseph: “After enduring weeks of abuse I am resigning effective immediately. I can no longer tolerate the abusive atmosphere you have allowed your employees to cultivate. I am disabled. My disability is not a joke. I have rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. I plan on discussing this matter further with my lawyer.” Sharon was shocked. She never witnessed any of her employees engaging in abusive behavior. Was she completely missing something? In order to understand Sharon’s situation, we need to go back to June 2015. During this timeframe, an Internet user uploaded a video to the social networking app Vine®. Vine® is a mobile video-recording application that allows users to create and upload six second video clips from their mobile devices. In this particular video, the user can be seen filming a police officer and shouting: “Officer, I just have one question for you. WHAT ARE THOSE?!?!!” The camera then pans down to the officer’s clunky boots. It was an obvious attempt to poke fun athe officer. View the original video. The user obviously has a very immature sense of humor. Surprisingly, however, thousands of Vine® users thought it was absolutely hilarious. The video has since amassed more than 32 million replays, 400 thousand “likes,” and has resulted in thousands of parody re-creations. Here are just a few parody videos that were created by employees in the workplace: https://vine.co/v/e6bYi1QZwZu https://vine.co/v/egLbW2vFwqr https://vine.co/v/eP6x9TqrjrO Here are a couple other videos uploaded by Vine® users giving their own creative spin to the original video: https://vine.co/v/e1Atn9EOlJH https://vine.co/v/eDPgq1eqFzb Why is this relevant to Sharon’s predicament? Like many Vine® users, several of Sharon’s employees found these viral videos absolutely hilarious. They also thought it would be nothing short of comedic genius to walk up to Joseph, gesture to his orthopedic footwear, and exclaim: “What are those?!?!” After all, it was just something they saw on Vine®, right? It’s just a harmless joke. Obviously if Sharon had seen her employees engaging in this conduct she would have put a stop to it. But she only heard the employees’ comments from a distance. She had no reason to think their banter was anything more than a stupid inside joke amongst friends. In hindsight, Sharon wishes she would have taken a few minutes to investigate the situation. The Bigger Picture Was this viral social media trend a one off? Absolutely not. A new piece of social media comedy goes viral every week. And discussion regarding these viral comedic posts is increasingly making their way into the workplace. For example, during November 2014, Chick-fil-A made headlines when a manager allegedly posted a notice banning a list of inside jokes and slang commonly used by his employees. Here is the notice courtesy of Business Insider. Most of the jokes and slang referenced in the notice are frequently thrown around on social media platforms like Vine®, Instagram® and Snapchat®. And a lot of the comedic banter gaining popularity on social media platforms is downright inappropriate. For example, the notice specifically calls out employees who mention being “legally blind.” That seems odd. Why would an employee think being legally blind is humorous? Social media provides the answer. The Internet went crazy this past year after a news interview surfaced with a suspected criminal. During the short interview, the suspect professed her innocence explaining that she could not have committed the crime because she is “legally blind.” The interview spawned thousands of parody videos with voice-overs. Here is a parody Vine® posted by what appears to be two on-duty firefighters. The “My name is Jeff” phenomenon is another well-known example. This trend followed the release of the recent film “22 Jump Street.” The Internet community went absolutely nuts when Channing Tatum spoke with a speech impediment while introducing himself as “Jeff” during the film. Here are two examples selected from the thousands of parody videos uploaded to Vine® making light of Mr. Tatum’s one-liner: https://vine.co/v/OvtXWpV05TE https://vine.co/v/O1qViDH0aTW Why is all this important? The focus is often on whether employees can be disciplined for their own social media posts. Employers, however, also have to keep something else in mind: Social media trends – particularly humor – often bleeds into everyday workplace interactions. The significance of the Internet’s “inside joke” of the week, however, may not be readily apparent to those who do not keep up with what is trending in cyber-space. Indeed, Sharon wasn’t on Vine® when the “what are those” videos went viral. She had no reason to think the phrase she heard had anything to do with Joseph’s disability. As a result, she simply brushed off her employees’ behavior without any investigation. Equally important, seemingly innocent references to inappropriate social media humor may also cause legal issues down the line. Sure, mimicking a popular Vine® video about being “legally blind” seems innocent enough. After all, everyone knows it’s just “Vine®” humor. And how harmful can it be? Thousands of people are doing it. But allowing employees to parrot what they see on social media can provide damaging evidence in a subsequent discrimination lawsuit. This is particularly true if such references are pervasive and supervisors also participate in the banter. Not convinced? Consider the following hypothetical: for about two weeks in 2015, a group of employees and managers circulated via email what they thought were the “funniest” “legally blind” Vine® parody videos. A few months later the employer happens to hire an individual who is, in fact, legally blind. Things don’t work out and the employer terminates the employee for poor performance. The former employee ends up filing a charge of discrimination and lawsuit alleging unlawful discrimination based on her vision impairment. A few of these emails end up surfacing and the employee points to them as evidence of a discriminatory animus. You better believe a plaintiff’s attorney will argue that the “it’s just something I saw on Vine®” defense shouldn’t cut it. Do we suggest that an employer should scour social media sites in order to determine whether office conversations are truly in compliance with its EEO policy? Absolutely not. But suppose you see an email from a supervisor to a subordinate curiously titled: “Netflix and Chill?” You might just want to discretely look into what that may imply. A quick search on Vine® will provide more than enough information. Additionally, employers should be sure to take prompt remedial action if an employee is overheard parroting an inappropriate Internet comedic trend. Remember: a joke the Internet decides is no longer funny after two months will still be of evidentiary value in a lawsuit years later. For more information, contact the author at ptschanz@btlaw.com.
DO IT FOR THE VINE! How This Week’s Viral Social Media Trend Can Spark Legal Liability in the Workplace
RELATED ARTICLES
Legal Pitfalls and Precautions When Returning to In-Person Events in COVID-19 Era
February 15, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Preemptive Strike: Employee Files TRO to Avoid Return to Workplace
September 18, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Shut Your Mouth: Policy Prohibiting Bad-Mouthing the Company Ruled Unlawful
August 27, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
That’s A Wrap: No Workplace Class Action For California Chipotle Workers
January 28, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Legal Pitfalls and Precautions When Returning to In-Person Events in COVID-19 Era
February 15, 2021 | Currents - Employment Law
Preemptive Strike: Employee Files TRO to Avoid Return to Workplace
September 18, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Shut Your Mouth: Policy Prohibiting Bad-Mouthing the Company Ruled Unlawful
August 27, 2020 | Labor Relations, National Labor Relations Board
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
That’s A Wrap: No Workplace Class Action For California Chipotle Workers
January 28, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Indiana Federal Court Gives Frostbitten ADA Plaintiff The Cold Shoulder
November 22, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Sixth Circuit Confirms Standard for 'Regarded As' Discrimination Under the ADA
November 12, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Big Changes For Illinois Employers: Workplace Transparency Act
September 24, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct
Navigating Discrimination Claims With Strong Documentation
September 6, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Illinois EPA Amendment Lowers Standard For Discrimination Claims
August 8, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations
July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal
June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Don't Assume That One-Size-Fits-All Employment Policies Work Everywhere
April 5, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct
New Illinois #MeToo Legislation Targets Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
April 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Employment Discrimination
OFCCP Issues New Directive for Analyzing Compensation
September 4, 2018 | Affirmative Action, Currents - Employment Law
Eleventh Circuit Overturns Dismissal of Race-Based Minimum Wage Statute Challenge
July 30, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Holds Full-Time Presence at Work not Essential Simply Because an Employer Says So
July 20, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Looks to Seventh and Ninth Circuits in Reviving Firefighters Title VII Suit against Union
June 6, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
In a Culture of Inclusiveness, Don’t Overlook Age
June 1, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Simple Reminders For Developing Healthy Workplace Culture
May 31, 2018 | Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Letter C: Co-Workers With Criminal Records? Your Workforce May Be More Open-Minded Than You Think
May 24, 2018 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
B is for “Bias” - Is Bias The Not-So-New Cause of Discrimination?
April 24, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Holds Transgender Status Protected Under Title VII
March 12, 2018 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio Bill Protecting LGBTQ Rights Receives Widespread Support at Committee Hearing
February 8, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Nursing Mothers Protected under Discrimination Laws, says Connecticut Federal Court
December 28, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Complaint Inquiries Now a Click Away With New Public Portal
November 3, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Attention, Class: Seventh Circuit Finds Preferred Teaching Methods Not Protected Activity Under ADA and Section 504
October 31, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Will Ohio Pass a Law to Protect LGBTQ Rights?
October 3, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court is Asked to Answer the Question: What Do You Mean by ‘Sex’?
September 11, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Don’t Get Caught in the Weeds: Hiring Issues and Medical Marijuana
August 21, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Court Invites EEOC’s Opinion on Whether Title VII Prohibits Sexual Orientation Discrimination
June 5, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Takes Second Look at Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under Title VII
May 26, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Need to Check an Employee’s Criminal Background? Tread Carefully
May 25, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio House Takes Steps to Modernize Outdated Antidiscrimination Statutes
May 23, 2017 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Avoiding the Danegeld: Discouraging Me-Too Claims Following a Settlement
May 5, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Lessons Learned: Job Descriptions Do Matter
May 1, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Can Employers Terminate an Employee Because of Vacation Photos Posted to Facebook?
April 28, 2017 | Employee Leave, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Court Tells Skydiver’s Estate It Won’t Reconsider Title VII Claim
April 19, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Minnesota Human Rights Act’s Statute of Limitations Tolls When Employer Investigates Discrimination Complaints
April 13, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Suspending Employee Who Hit Boss With Vehicle Not Retaliation
April 11, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Does Same-Sex Harassment Support Gender Discrimination Claims? Texas Supreme Court to Decide
March 17, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Mugshots Gone Viral: Internet Clickbait is a Hiring Manager’s Minefield
March 16, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Case Sent Back to Lower Courts by Supreme Court
March 8, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Charge-d Atmosphere: A Few Pointers When a Current Employee Files a Charge
February 21, 2017 | EEOC, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Blog Update: North Carolina Business that Fired Pregnant Employee Agrees to Three-Year Consent Decree with EEOC
February 13, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
2016: EEOC Charges Keep Climbing
February 8, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Issues New Guidelines on National Origin Discrimination
November 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Using an Employee’s Social Media Posts to Prove Laziness? Think Again
November 21, 2016 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit Discards Well-Worn Standard for Discrimination Cases
August 29, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Ray of Hope Peeks Through a Mound of Proposed EEOC Data Requirements: Senators Fight to Nix EEOC Plan
August 25, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
OSHA’s New Mandatory Electronic Recordkeeping Rule
June 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Employers Need Not Tolerate Workers Screaming On the Electronic Street Corner
June 6, 2016 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
A Smorgasbord of Termination Reasons That Might Be Used Against You
May 13, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Access Addressed in New EEOC Fact Sheet
May 6, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A RIFing Yarn: How Being Able to Support a RIF Pays Off Down the Road
April 23, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Benefits of Adopting an Effective Complaint-Reporting Procedure
April 22, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Court Says Mandatory Flu Vaccine for Hospital Worker Does Not Violate Title VII
April 18, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Don’t Call a Transgender Employee “It”
April 6, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
EMPLOYERS: The #ElderlyChristmasSongs Hashtag Is Trending On Twitter
December 9, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
The Viral Spiral: How An Employee’s Facebook Post Dragged Her Employer Into A Social Media Controversy
November 24, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Federal Court Allows ADEA “Pattern-or-Practice” Claim to Proceed
November 23, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EMOJI-GOSH! How Emojis in Workplace Communications Can Spark A Lawsuit (Or Make It Harder To Defend One)
November 20, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Employee Suspended For Tweet: What We Can Learn From This Real World Example
November 20, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Employers: Twitter is Going Crazy Over The #InternationalMensDay Hashtag
November 19, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Trending Now: How the Latest News Going Viral Can Lead to Employment Litigation
November 17, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Casual Friday: Make Sure Your Employees Keep it Classy
November 13, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Clarifies Viability of Retaliation Claim Under Section 1983 For Having Complained of Discrimination
September 4, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Choose Your Words Wisely
September 3, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Not All Good Deeds Are Punished: A Paid Suspension Is Not An Adverse Employment Action For Title VII
August 19, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
More Hope for Employers Who Have Ever Felt Bullied by the EEOC
July 1, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Do Not Seek DNA Information From Employees…
June 19, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Zoo Fires Employee For Social Media Comment About Serving “Rude A** White People”
June 18, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Targets Minnesota Company For Alleged Transgender Discrimination
June 17, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Breaking News: Employees Are Still Posting Inappropriate Content On Facebook. So Let’s Just Learn From Their Lack of Judgment
May 1, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Unanimity and Clarity: U.S. Supreme Court Outlines Standards for Judicial Review of EEOC Conciliation
April 29, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court to Provide Guidance on Constructive Discharge Statute of Limitations Period
April 29, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
No Girls Allowed Isn’t Allowed: Even Roughnecks Have To Follow The Law
April 1, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
3 Types of Associational Discrimination Claims
March 23, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Saks Settles Controversial Transgender Discrimination Case
March 9, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Tweet Heard Round the World
February 10, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
This Message Will Self Destruct in 10 Seconds: Snapchat, Confide and the Implications of Disappearing Content on Your Business
February 9, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Man Claiming Hand Scanning Time Clock Causes “Mark of the Beast” Wins Religious Discrimination Suit
January 23, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Hope For Employers: Some Courts Are Requiring The EEOC To Thoroughly Investigate Allegations Before Siding With Employees
January 15, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
The Year in Social Media: Four Big Developments from 2014
December 29, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Avoid Going From Ho! Ho! Ho! To Oh No! No! No!
December 23, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Recent Case In Michigan Highlights Increased Focus On Transgender Discrimination
November 7, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Watch Your Language in the Workplace: Timeless Challenge for Employers
October 3, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC SUES TWO EMPLOYERS FOR TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATION
September 30, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Reminder: Pregnant Employees are a Protected Class
September 18, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Employee Evaluation Practices Under Scrutiny
August 1, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC turns its focus to the impact of social media in employment litigation
March 20, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Workplace Bullying may Amount to Actionable Discrimination
February 27, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Wisconsin Likely to Limit Access to Social Media Accounts
February 21, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Academic Studies About Screening Applicants’ Social Media: New Cottage Industry?
January 15, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
“Using Social Media to Discriminate”: Please Read the Fine Print
December 2, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Your Facebook “Like” May Be Constitutionally-Protected Speech
September 27, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Social Media Policy Provides Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Reason for Termination
September 25, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Employers May Inadvertently Break the Law When They Discipline Employees for Facebook “Wall” Posts
August 30, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Gov. Christie The First to Stand Up to Social Media Legislation Wave?
May 13, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Three States Pass Legislation on Limiting Access to Social Medial Passwords
May 3, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Congress Rejects Password Protection Amendment To CISPA
April 24, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Washington State Legislators Withdraw Bill Allowing Employers to Access Social Media Accounts During Investigations
April 11, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
What Happens on Facebook Stays on Facebook…Or Else
April 3, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Breaking - Mixed Bag Ruling In California Mixed Motive Case
February 8, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Texas Legislature Will Consider Employers’ Ability to Access Social Media Passwords
January 7, 2013 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
California Passes Law to Regulate Access to Employees’ Social Media Accounts
October 4, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Cannot Claim “Deliberative Process Privilege” To Preclude Investigator’s Deposition
July 25, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Expands on "Cat's Paw" Discrimination
July 16, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Complaints Need Not Include Facts Which Would Support a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination under McDonnell Douglas
July 5, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Finds that Transgender Workers Are Protected by Title VII
June 4, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center