Page is loading...
Print Logo Logo

Split Decision: Top 5 Noncompete Stories Lean Slightly in Favor of Enforcement

Bill Nolan

William A. Nolan

Columbus Managing Partner

One frequent question is whether there is a trend in favor of or against noncompete agreements. It has seemed to me in recent years that there is more noise suggesting the tide is turning against noncompete agreements, but these conclusions seemed to be based on anecdotal evidence at best, wishful thinking at worst. Law360 has published articles in recent years offering a list of noncompete decisions, with no reason to tilt the list one way or another, so it is interesting to look at the list and see which way, if any, the decisions tend. 2013’s list ( available here ) featured five court decisions holding as follows.

1. Fifield v. Premier Dealer Services, Inc ., an Illinois appeals court case that stating that at least two years of continued employment was necessary to constitute sufficient consideration for a noncompete agreement. The Illinois Supreme Court declined to consider an appeal. (1-0 against enforcement)

2. Atlantic Marine Construction v. Western District of Texas , a U.S. Supreme Court decision that is not a noncompete case, but will lend strong support in favor of forum selection clauses, which is beneficial to enforcing parties. (1-1) I have written here about how choice of forum clauses can affect noncompete cases.

3. Tradesman International v. Black, a federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision that not only affirmed a lower court’s denial of an injunction to enforce noncompetes, but sanctioned the enforcing company for what it found to be a trade secrets claim brought in bad faith. (2-1 against)

4. Assurance Data v. Malyevac, a Virginia Supreme Court decision in which the state’s high court discouraged prematurely dismissing cases brought to enforce seemingly overbroad noncompetes without looking at the facts of the particular case. (2-2)

5. Corporate Technologies v. Harnett, a federal First Circuit Court of Appeals case in which the court took a broader view of what constitutes “solicitation” prohibited by an agreement. (3-2 for)

Of course, while prominent in varying cases, these five cases are anecdotal as well. Further, 2013 was a slow year for critical noncompete cases. Of these five, I think arguably only Fifield and Assurance Data fall in that category. (Atlantic Marine seems unsurprising – evidenced perhaps by the Court’s unanimity.) In short, if we can draw any conclusion from 2013 it is the continuing importance of individual states’ laws in noncompete disputes, and the importance of employers – whether enforcing or defending – to recognize that each noncompete situation has its own unique strategic considerations.

(Note that you will need to sign up for a trial subscription if you want to read the full content of the Law 360 article linked above unless you already subscribe.)


Six Statements That May Mean Your Business Will Keep an Employment Lawyer Busy

June 1, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law

Illinois Cracks Down on Non-competes for Low-Wage Workers

September 7, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law

State Noncompete Statutes, Your Company, and the Economy: One Perspective

February 29, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law

Massachusetts and the Impending Death of Noncompetes Part II: De Facto Enforcement of Noncompetes

February 15, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law

Groundhog Day: Declaring the Impending Death of Massachusetts Noncompetes

February 8, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law


Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.

View Subscription Center
Trending Connect
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to use cookies.