We have written often on this blog, including here, about the importance of the difference in state laws on noncompete agreements to drafting and enforcement strategies. A New York case involving one such case recently went somewhat viral, probably because of the court’s use of the term “truly obnoxious” four times in the opinion to refer to the employer’s Florida choice of law clause. Far be it from me to stand in the way of a good headline, but in context the court was simply using language from prior New York case law to state the fairly common legal rule that a court in state A will likely not enforce a contractual clause to follow the law of state B where state B’s law would be contrary to the public policy of state A. This principle comes up often in noncompete law, such as when “state A” is a state where the court will not modify an overly restrictive noncompete to make it enforceable and state B will. A state A court will likely reject a state B choice of law clause and simply flat out refuse to enforce an overly broad noncompete agreement. In the New York case, the New York court refused to enforce a non-solicitation clause under New York law, even though the parties specified the application of Florida law in their agreement. As always, employers who do business in multiple states, or even can be competed with from outside their home state, should work with counsel to craft a strategy to maximize enforcement in light of the various state laws that may apply to them. Choice of law decisions can be critical. In addition, as discussed more here, choice of forum clauses – specifying where disputes must be litigated – are also critical and, while not bulletproof, tend to be enforced more by out of state courts than choice of law clauses. (It is not evident from the New York decision that there was such a clause there.)
RELATED ARTICLES
Café Managers’ Second Attempt At Conditional Certification Fails
October 22, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
New York Passes Sweeping Changes to Anti-Harassment Law
June 25, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
ICE Raids on 7-Eleven Franchise Stores Result in 21 Arrests
January 12, 2018 | Employment Lessons, High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Six Statements That May Mean Your Business Will Keep an Employment Lawyer Busy
June 1, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Illinois Cracks Down on Non-competes for Low-Wage Workers
September 7, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Café Managers’ Second Attempt At Conditional Certification Fails
October 22, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
New York Passes Sweeping Changes to Anti-Harassment Law
June 25, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
ICE Raids on 7-Eleven Franchise Stores Result in 21 Arrests
January 12, 2018 | Employment Lessons, High Stakes Employment Issues, Currents - Employment Law
Six Statements That May Mean Your Business Will Keep an Employment Lawyer Busy
June 1, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Illinois Cracks Down on Non-competes for Low-Wage Workers
September 7, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
State Noncompete Statutes, Your Company, and the Economy: One Perspective
February 29, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Massachusetts and the Impending Death of Noncompetes Part II: De Facto Enforcement of Noncompetes
February 15, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Groundhog Day: Declaring the Impending Death of Massachusetts Noncompetes
February 8, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Pennsylvania Supreme Court “Considers” Noncompetes: Mere Continued Employment Not Enough
November 19, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Noncompete Roundup – Florida
November 7, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Noncompete Roundup – Oklahoma
November 6, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Noncompetes In Mexico
October 13, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Think Before You Shoot on Noncompete: Why The Threatening Letter May Not Be Your First Move
October 12, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
An Annual Ritual: Massachusetts Noncompete Legislation
July 1, 2015 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Did California Just Fire No-Employment Provisions From Settlement Agreements?
April 13, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Some HR Numbers That Should Be Zero In Your Organization
February 16, 2015 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Five Things to Know About Trade Secrets
December 22, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Decision Bears A Close Look on Application of Quid Pro Quo Harassment
November 24, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Five Distinctive Things About Ohio and Employment Law
November 10, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Beware of the court of public opinion
October 28, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Confidentiality & Nondisclosure Agreements Are No Substitute For Noncompetes
October 27, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Opinions About Noncompetes: Actual Supporting Data Not Required
June 23, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
It’s Back: Proposal to Ban Massachusetts Noncompetes (and Related Economic Theories)
April 14, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Employers, You All Have Secrets: New Report Might Help You Protect Them
April 6, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Have You Double-Checked The Language Of Your Non-Compete Lately? If Not, You Need To...
March 26, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
There Were No Mice Available? Testing Noncompetes and Motivation in Settings That Don’t Sound Much Like Employment
February 17, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Split Decision: Top 5 Noncompete Stories Lean Slightly in Favor of Enforcement
February 3, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Different Strokes for Different Folks (or Red, Blue, and Purple-Pencil America): How The 50 States Differ On Revising Non-Competes
January 3, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Coast to Coast Noncompete Part 2: Still Going in 3 Courts in 2 States
December 23, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
December Is Noncompete Month in the General Media
December 16, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Coast-to-Coast Noncompete Dispute Highlights 3 Key Enforcement Strategies
October 22, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Governor Would Like Massachusetts to Join California As a Non-Noncompete State
September 16, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
State Lines May Not Be When It Comes to Noncompetes
September 3, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Do You Have Restrictive Covenants In Texas? If So, Be Careful What You Ask For
August 30, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio Supreme Court Reverses Self on Noncompete in Merger Situation
October 11, 2012 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Entertainers, Facebook Messages and the Work-Product Doctrine?
May 22, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center