A recent 7th Circuit case demonstrates the importance of carefully designing workplace investigations to account for a variety of potential claims. In Hobgood v. Illinois Gaming Board, a gaming board employee filed suit against his employer alleging unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII and the First Amendment. The employee was terminated for helping his coworker organize and research a suit against the gaming board, citing widespread corruption in its hiring policies. Additionally, the employee supplied two confidential documents supporting the coworker’s claims. The coworker’s lawsuit exposed the confidential documents and alerted the board’s top executives that the employee was assisting his coworker with the lawsuit; the board initiated an internal investigation of the employee to determine whether he engaged in misconduct warranting termination.
The breadth of the internal investigation was found to deviate from the employer's usual policies, and presented a “convincing mosaic” of evidence that “the gaming board was only interested in seeing [the employee] punished for helping a coworker sue the board.” Pieces of this “convincing mosaic” include: the employer telling the investigator to consider termination as the preferred option, the commencement of the investigation despite the state police and state attorney’s office clearing the employee of any wrongdoing, and finally, the breadth of the investigation which involved searching the employee’s office for documents unrelated to the suit and studying the employee’s phone records. The court found that “this ‘extraordinary departure’ from board policy could support adverse inferences about the defendants’ motives,” and remanded the case for trial. The moral of the story for all employers is that designing a workplace investigation to suit the particular situation, taking into account the various potential liabilities, is a critical and complicated process. Even employers equipped to handle investigations internally should consult with counsel about the investigation process before embarking. About the Author: Lauren Box is a summer associate in Barnes & Thornburg LLP's Indianapolis, Ind. office. She attends the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.RELATED ARTICLES
COVID-19 Class Action Litigation Heats Up Over Temperature Checks
October 30, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Motorin’: CAFA Removal Upheld, California Wage and Hour Class Action Dismissed
August 26, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Employment Lessons
Outbreak of COVID-19 Public Nuisance Cases Continues
August 7, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Welcome to the Hotel COVID Lockdown – Seafood Employees Allege Failure to Pay and False Imprisonment
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Public Nuisance Claims Emerge In COVID-19 Workplace Litigation Filings
June 19, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
COVID-19 Class Action Litigation Heats Up Over Temperature Checks
October 30, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Motorin’: CAFA Removal Upheld, California Wage and Hour Class Action Dismissed
August 26, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Employment Lessons
Outbreak of COVID-19 Public Nuisance Cases Continues
August 7, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Welcome to the Hotel COVID Lockdown – Seafood Employees Allege Failure to Pay and False Imprisonment
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Public Nuisance Claims Emerge In COVID-19 Workplace Litigation Filings
June 19, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
COVID-19 Related Workplace Litigation Picks Up Steam
June 12, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues
Illinois Federal Court Rejects Arbitration of BIPA Class Action
June 10, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Brain Freeze: California Federal Court Rejects Ice Cream Shop’s CAFA Removal
May 29, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit Confirms Article III Standing for BIPA Plaintiffs
May 7, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Third-Party Biometric Timekeeping Provider Chops Down BIPA Liability
April 14, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
That’s A Wrap: No Workplace Class Action For California Chipotle Workers
January 28, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
California Federal Court Leaves Retail Employees Holding the Bag
January 21, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law
Third Circuit Schools District Court on Workplace Class Certification
January 8, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
Class Arbitrability is a Decision for the Court, Not the Arbitrator
July 24, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, High Stakes Employment Issues
Don't Let Down Your Guard: An Object Lesson In Dealing With Government Investigators
December 17, 2018 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Lessons
Know Before You Go: Does the DOL’s New PAID Program Pay Off For Employers?
April 16, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Lesson: Don’t Underestimate Court’s Ability to Change Its Mind
April 6, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Federal Lawsuit Over Mass Layoffs Not on the Menu for California Restaurant Group
February 27, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Dancer Employees Allegedly Stripped of Wages Through Misclassification
November 1, 2016 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Collective and Class Actions: Interns, Assistant Managers – and their Lawyers!
July 18, 2014 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Top Tech Companies Headed to Trial in Talent Poaching Conspiracy Case
April 10, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Losing A Fair Labor Standards Act Lawsuit Can Be Costly
November 8, 2012 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit Sides With Defendants On Eavesdropping Case
October 18, 2012 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center