A recent case demonstrates the frustrating quandaries that employers can find themselves in if they do not choose their words carefully. In Gulden v. Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc., Case No. BC468909, a 76-year-old engineer sued his employer for age discrimination after he was laid off. His employer had what would seem to be a good multi-faceted defense: The engineer was just one of 81 employees who were laid off (most of whom were significantly younger than him), he was the only part-time employee in his department, the project that he was working on was nearly complete, and his job duties could be easily absorbed by other employees. Nevertheless, the case survived summary judgment. The director of the engineer’s department allegedly told the engineer that he had been selected for the lay off because the director “had to consider the future of the company” and because the engineer had been with the company for “a long time.” These statements, the engineer argued, were veiled references to his age.
How can a company keep itself from getting sued, one might ask, if such seemingly benign statements are enough to convince a judge that a reasonable jury could infer discriminatory intent? That’s a good question. Employers can take some solace in the fact that the case was brought in California – a state that is notoriously employee-friendly – and that the jury found for the company after just 34 minutes of deliberations. That an expensive trial was necessary underscores something that should be commonsense to any seasoned human resources professional, however. Be careful what you say to a newly laid-off employee. Even the most innocuous-seeming statements could come back to haunt you.RELATED ARTICLES
In a Culture of Inclusiveness, Don’t Overlook Age
June 1, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Teacher’s ADA, Age Discrimination Claim Given New Life by Sixth Circuit
September 22, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act Turns 50
June 8, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Unwise Old Sayings? Watch Out For Stereotypes That Might Trigger An Age Discrimination Lawsuit
March 9, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
55-Year-Old Employee Fails to Establish Age Discrimination Claim against 3D Printing Company
May 10, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
In a Culture of Inclusiveness, Don’t Overlook Age
June 1, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Teacher’s ADA, Age Discrimination Claim Given New Life by Sixth Circuit
September 22, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act Turns 50
June 8, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Unwise Old Sayings? Watch Out For Stereotypes That Might Trigger An Age Discrimination Lawsuit
March 9, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
55-Year-Old Employee Fails to Establish Age Discrimination Claim against 3D Printing Company
May 10, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
University of Iowa Wins Trial Against Immigration Lawyer Claiming Age Discrimination
March 31, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Nothing Could Be Finer Than To Incorporate In Carolina . . .
December 22, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
This Should Go Without Saying: Replacing an Older Worker with Two Younger Workers is Not Consistent with a Reduction in Force Defense
May 26, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Supervisor’s Statement Precludes Summary Judgment
January 30, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Don’t Mess With Texas…Roadhouse
October 13, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
What’s In Your RIF?
September 17, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Age Discrimination and Technology: Don’t Take a “Mechanized” Approach
July 3, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
How much can a Facebook post cost you? About $80K
February 27, 2014 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Reference to Employee’s “Shelf Life” Not Enough to Prove Age Discrimination
November 18, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Informal Layoff Decision Survives Age Discrimination Claim - But You May Not Want To Try This At Home
October 30, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court to Kick Off New Term With Age Discrimination Issue
October 2, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
You May Have More Employees Than You Think (Part II)
August 26, 2013 | Employee Health Issues, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Inconsistent Treatment Of Employees Gets You Every Time
April 24, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Pennsylvania District Court Conditionally Recognizes Novel “Over-50” Class
July 24, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center