On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding the definition of a “supervisor” as it relates to an employer’s vicarious liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In Vance v. Ball State University, the Court pressed both sides to explain what the impact would be should it expand the “supervisor” definition under Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998), and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998) should the Court choose to expand the “supervisor” definition. A copy of the hearing transcript is here.
Currently, under certain circumstances, an employer can be vicariously and strictly liable for workplace harassment of, and discriminatory conduct directed toward, subordinate employees by “Supervisors.” However, under Faragher and Ellerth, an employer is vicariously liable for harassment or discrimination inflicted by employees' co-workers only if the complaining employee can prove that the employer was negligent in either discovering or remedying the offending conduct. The Vance Court will decide whether the “supervisor” definition (a) includes only those management-level employees whom the employer vests with authority to direct and oversee other employees' daily work; or (b) is limited to those management-level employees who have the power to "hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or discipline" their victim. At oral arguments, both sides urged the Court to adopt a standard similar to the standard utilized by Second Circuit or the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, both of which consider employees with the authority to direct the alleged victim’s daily work activities to be supervisors. The Seventh Circuit’s definition, as rendered in Vance, requires an employee to have the power to hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or disciplined an alleged victim to be deemed a supervisor. Interestingly, Justices Scalia and Alito appeared disappointed that both sides argued against the Seventh Circuit’s definition in Vance, claiming it to be overly broad and failing to include certain employees who should be considered supervisors. Instead, the difference between the parties’ arguments centered on whether remand was warranted. Ms. Vance’s counsel asserted that further discovery would be necessary if the Court announced a new definition for who is considered a supervisor. In comparison, counsel for Ball State University argued that the Court should announce the new definition and still affirm the Seventh Circuit’s decision since it did not change whether the individual at the center of the controversy was a “supervisor.” Counsel for Ball State explained that person served solely as a conduit for other supervisor’s work assignments to Ms. Vance.
Supreme Court Examines “Supervisor” Definition In Bias Suits
RELATED ARTICLES
Supreme Court Limits Federal Court’s Ability to Modify, Vacate, and Confirm Arbitration Awards
April 5, 2022 | Currents - Employment Law, Letter of the Law
Future of OSHA Vaccine-or-Test Mandate Looks Tenuous as Supreme Court Weighs In
January 7, 2022 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues, Supreme Court Watch
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
No Right, Just Rules: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Steakhouse Managers’ Claims
October 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
Agreement to Arbitrate Acknowledged, Not Accepted, Eighth Circuit Says
July 17, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, High Stakes Employment Issues, Fair Labor Standards Act, Employment Lessons
×
Supreme Court Limits Federal Court’s Ability to Modify, Vacate, and Confirm Arbitration Awards
April 5, 2022 | Currents - Employment Law, Letter of the Law
Future of OSHA Vaccine-or-Test Mandate Looks Tenuous as Supreme Court Weighs In
January 7, 2022 | Currents - Employment Law, Employee Health Issues, Supreme Court Watch
SCOTUS Favors Employers’ Religious Liberties Over Employee Rights
July 9, 2020 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Supreme Court Watch
No Right, Just Rules: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Steakhouse Managers’ Claims
October 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act
Agreement to Arbitrate Acknowledged, Not Accepted, Eighth Circuit Says
July 17, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, High Stakes Employment Issues, Fair Labor Standards Act, Employment Lessons
Divided SCOTUS Affirms Auer Deference to Agencies’ Interpretations
July 3, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Misidentification of Employer in Discrimination Charge Not Enough for Dismissal
June 14, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Employment Discrimination
Supreme Court Holds Title VII Charge-Filing Is Mandatory but Not Jurisdictional
June 7, 2019 | Currents - Employment Law, Supreme Court Watch
Will There Be An Epic Backlash?
June 27, 2018 | Fair Labor Standards Act, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Says No To Repeat Class Actions After Statute Of Limitations
June 14, 2018 | Employment Lessons, Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Workplace Culture 2.0: More Leadership, Less Management
May 29, 2018 | Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Sex, Power & the Workplace Responding to the Skeptics Q&A: Part 2
April 4, 2018 | Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Sixth Circuit Holds Transgender Status Protected Under Title VII
March 12, 2018 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Another Court Reverses Course: Second Circuit Holds Title VII Forbids Sexual Orientation Discrimination
February 27, 2018 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Nursing Mothers Protected under Discrimination Laws, says Connecticut Federal Court
December 28, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Employment Lessons, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
(Informal) Survey Says: Most Employers Not Waiting for Courts to Decide Whether Title VII Covers Sexual Orientation
November 7, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
The Gradual But Decided Shift to a Much More Complex World of Employment Law
September 29, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court is Asked to Answer the Question: What Do You Mean by ‘Sex’?
September 11, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Lessons Learned: As Flu Shot Season Approaches, Inflexible Rules Can Cause Accommodation Headaches
August 31, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit Says EEOC May Press on With Enforcement Efforts After Right-to-Sue
August 17, 2017 | EEOC, Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Sexual Orientation: DOJ and EEOC Take Opposite Positions in Amicus Briefs Filed in Same Case
August 8, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Workplace Culture and Conduct, Currents - Employment Law
Sticks and Stones: When Texts and Emails Will Hurt You
July 18, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Firing an Employee? Avoid Litigation by Carefully Reviewing the Issues
July 7, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Did a Lower Court Throw Schools an IEP Life Raft?
July 5, 2017 | Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Court Invites EEOC’s Opinion on Whether Title VII Prohibits Sexual Orientation Discrimination
June 5, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Takes Second Look at Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under Title VII
May 26, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Need to Check an Employee’s Criminal Background? Tread Carefully
May 25, 2017 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Court Tells Skydiver’s Estate It Won’t Reconsider Title VII Claim
April 19, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Update on Trump’s Line-Up for DOL and Supreme Court
March 28, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Nominee Gorsuch Receives ABA’s Highest Rating
March 10, 2017 | Supreme Court Watch, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Case Sent Back to Lower Courts by Supreme Court
March 8, 2017 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Continues Fight Against Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Healthcare Workers
September 29, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
War Over Sexual Orientation and Title VII Rages On
September 22, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Issues Anti-Retaliation Guidance
September 8, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
More Flu Vaccine News: EEOC Once Again Alleges Hospital’s Mandatory Flu Vaccine Policy Violates Title VII
August 19, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Fifth Circuit Triples Down on the Legality of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
August 15, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
More Flu Vaccine News – EEOC Alleges Hospital’s Mandatory Flu Vaccine Policy Violates Title VII
July 11, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Bathroom Access Addressed in New EEOC Fact Sheet
May 6, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Court Says Mandatory Flu Vaccine for Hospital Worker Does Not Violate Title VII
April 18, 2016 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Continues Visible Stance on Sexual Orientation Discrimination Protection
March 9, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Refusal to Exempt Employee from “Mark of the Beast” Hand Scanner Proves Damning for Company
February 16, 2016 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Do You Even Lift, Bro? How A Case Of Seemingly Innocent Workplace Bullying Can Blindside Your Company With A Title VII Lawsuit
November 30, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Federal Court Allows ADEA “Pattern-or-Practice” Claim to Proceed
November 23, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Employers: Twitter is Going Crazy Over The #InternationalMensDay Hashtag
November 19, 2015 | Social Media and Technology, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Clarifies Viability of Retaliation Claim Under Section 1983 For Having Complained of Discrimination
September 4, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Not All Good Deeds Are Punished: A Paid Suspension Is Not An Adverse Employment Action For Title VII
August 19, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
UPS’ Employment Policies Come Under Scrutiny, Again
July 21, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
“Perceived as” Religious Bias Claims? – A Federal Court in Michigan Says “Yes”
July 13, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Does Being “Perceived As” Muslim Support A Title VII Claim? One Court Says Yes
June 22, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Targets Minnesota Company For Alleged Transgender Discrimination
June 17, 2015 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Transgender Status in the Workplace – First an EEOC Issue and Now an OSHA Issue?
May 28, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Paradigm Shift: Triple Standard of Reasonable Accommodations
April 30, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Unanimity and Clarity: U.S. Supreme Court Outlines Standards for Judicial Review of EEOC Conciliation
April 29, 2015 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court to Provide Guidance on Constructive Discharge Statute of Limitations Period
April 29, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Single “Heil Hitler” Not Hostile Enough, Says the Fifth Circuit
March 17, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Saks Settles Controversial Transgender Discrimination Case
March 9, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Who Knew? U.S. Supreme Court Justices Offer Employment Tips
February 26, 2015 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Recent Case In Michigan Highlights Increased Focus On Transgender Discrimination
November 7, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Part of Increasing Focus on LGBT Issues
October 31, 2014 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
There’s No Question – The EEOC’s Strategic Enforcement Plan Is In Full Bloom
October 2, 2014 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC SUES TWO EMPLOYERS FOR TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATION
September 30, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Home Sweet Home? Employers and Employees Are Just Scratching the Surface of How Work and Home Fit Together
August 22, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
When “I Love You” May Be Too Much
August 15, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Could Corporate Wellness Programs Land A Business in Hot Water?
August 14, 2014 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
Florida Supreme Court Resolves Split in Lower Court – Pregnancy Is a Protected Class under Florida Civil Rights Act
April 21, 2014 | Employee Health Issues, Employment Discrimination, Pregnancy, Currents - Employment Law
Second Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Untimely Filed State Law Claims from Title VII Harassment Suit
March 17, 2014 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Third Circuit Rejects Plaintiff’s Claims That Entity To Whom She Provided Consulting Services Was Her “Employer” Under Title VII or the NJLAD
January 24, 2014 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Behind the Numbers: Employment Discrimination Cases at the Federal Level Decline, But Why?
November 26, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Quick Reminder Regarding Complaints in the Workplace
October 23, 2013 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
A Supreme Court Update: Notes on Wednesday’s Oral Argument About Title VII Retaliation Claims
April 25, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Internal Investigations Can Be Crucial to Defense Against Retaliation Claims
March 8, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Seventh Circuit to Employers: Be specific, ambiguities in Rule 68 offers of judgment might cost you
March 6, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Perception Is Reality
March 1, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
High Court to Decide Whether “but-for” Standard Applies to Retaliation Claims Under Title VII
January 23, 2013 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
“Employee” Status Not Necessarily Dependent on Compensation
December 10, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Releases Q&A Fact Sheet On Application of Title VII and ADA to Victims of Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking
October 26, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
On The Radar: Supreme Court Set to Resolve Circuit Split as to Definition of Supervisor Under Title VII
October 24, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
High Court Will Not Evaluate Whether Summary Judgment Orders Violate Plaintiffs’ Seventh Amendment Rights
October 16, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
To Avoid Employer Liability for Harassment, Keep an Eye on “Supervisors”
September 17, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Sues Burger King Franchisee Over Employee’s Religious Accommodation Request
August 27, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court's Ruling on Healthcare Impacts Employers
June 29, 2012 | Employee Health Issues, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Employment Provision in Arizona Immigration Law
June 27, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
U.S. Supreme Court to consider definition of “supervisor” for purposes of vicarious liability in hostile work environment case
June 26, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Supreme Court Issues Long-Awaited Decision in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
June 18, 2012 | Traditional Labor, Currents - Employment Law
Plaintiff’s Efforts to Preclude Her Deposition in Discrimination/Retaliation Suit Rejected by U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
June 13, 2012 | Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Business Groups Join In Request For EEOC To Pay For Title VII Case
June 11, 2012 | EEOC, Currents - Employment Law
EEOC Finds that Transgender Workers Are Protected by Title VII
June 4, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
Illegal Immigration Status Is Not Protected By Title VII
May 24, 2012 | EEOC, Employment Discrimination, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center
RELATED TOPICS
Civil Rights Act
Supervisor
Supreme Court
Title VII
TOP
