Employers that want to ensure key workers do not jump ship to work for the competition have just one realistic option: a non-competition agreement. Given the intense scrutiny that courts have given to noncompetes in recent years, many employers have tried to down-shift to confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements, based on the idea that this will enable them to secure their trade secrets and other sensitive information without having to muck about with the difficulties of enforcing a non-compete. While this seems like a good solution in concept, the inherent problem is that in almost all cases, it will not prevent an employee from working for a competitor. Take, for example, a situation where an employee – who is a signatory to a confidentiality agreement but not a noncompete – leaves her employer to work for a competitor. After the employee leaves, the employer discovers that she downloaded confidential company data to an external hard drive on her way out the door. Lacking a noncompete, the company’s options for prohibiting the employee from working for the competitor are extremely limited. In some states, the “inevitable disclosure doctrine” allows a court to enjoin the employee from working for a competitor because of the threatened misappropriation of trade secrets. In order to pursue such a claim, the employer typically must show (1) that it has trade secret information, (2) that the employee in question had access to the trade secrets, and (3) the employee’s responsibilities at her new employer make it “inevitable” that she will use or disclose those trade secrets in the performance of her job for the new employer. This typically is a steep hill to climb. Added to that, not all states recognize the doctrine and in many of those that do, its application has been inconsistent. In most situations, employers send out letters to employees demanding that they immediately return any confidential or trade secret materials they took with them when they left the company. If the employee does as asked and returns the items, there is not much more an employer can do – particularly if the employee or her new employer represent that no confidential or trade secret information has or will be divulged. Without evidence of misappropriation or that the disclosure of information will be inevitable, a lawsuit seeking to enjoin the employee from working for the competitor likely will fail. That leaves the employer with attempting to sue the employee for breach of the confidentiality agreement or asserting other tort claims, such as breaching their fiduciary duties. While these claims ultimately may be successful, they will not bar the employee from working for a competitor. In short, if an employer wants to prohibit key employees from working for the competition, there really is no substitute for a noncompete agreement.
Confidentiality & Nondisclosure Agreements Are No Substitute For Noncompetes
Hannesson Murphy
PartnerRELATED ARTICLES
Six Statements That May Mean Your Business Will Keep an Employment Lawyer Busy
June 1, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Illinois Cracks Down on Non-competes for Low-Wage Workers
September 7, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
State Noncompete Statutes, Your Company, and the Economy: One Perspective
February 29, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Massachusetts and the Impending Death of Noncompetes Part II: De Facto Enforcement of Noncompetes
February 15, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Groundhog Day: Declaring the Impending Death of Massachusetts Noncompetes
February 8, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Six Statements That May Mean Your Business Will Keep an Employment Lawyer Busy
June 1, 2017 | Employment Lessons, Currents - Employment Law
Illinois Cracks Down on Non-competes for Low-Wage Workers
September 7, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
State Noncompete Statutes, Your Company, and the Economy: One Perspective
February 29, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Massachusetts and the Impending Death of Noncompetes Part II: De Facto Enforcement of Noncompetes
February 15, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Groundhog Day: Declaring the Impending Death of Massachusetts Noncompetes
February 8, 2016 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Pennsylvania Supreme Court “Considers” Noncompetes: Mere Continued Employment Not Enough
November 19, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Noncompete Roundup – Florida
November 7, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Noncompete Roundup – Oklahoma
November 6, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Noncompetes In Mexico
October 13, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Think Before You Shoot on Noncompete: Why The Threatening Letter May Not Be Your First Move
October 12, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
An Annual Ritual: Massachusetts Noncompete Legislation
July 1, 2015 | High Stakes Employment Issues, Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Did California Just Fire No-Employment Provisions From Settlement Agreements?
April 13, 2015 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Some HR Numbers That Should Be Zero In Your Organization
February 16, 2015 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Five Things to Know About Trade Secrets
December 22, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Five Distinctive Things About Ohio and Employment Law
November 10, 2014 | Letter of the Law, Currents - Employment Law
Beware of the court of public opinion
October 28, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Opinions About Noncompetes: Actual Supporting Data Not Required
June 23, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
It’s Back: Proposal to Ban Massachusetts Noncompetes (and Related Economic Theories)
April 14, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Employers, You All Have Secrets: New Report Might Help You Protect Them
April 6, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Have You Double-Checked The Language Of Your Non-Compete Lately? If Not, You Need To...
March 26, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Behind “Obnoxious” Headlines, A Good Noncompete Strategy Reminder
March 18, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
There Were No Mice Available? Testing Noncompetes and Motivation in Settings That Don’t Sound Much Like Employment
February 17, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Split Decision: Top 5 Noncompete Stories Lean Slightly in Favor of Enforcement
February 3, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Different Strokes for Different Folks (or Red, Blue, and Purple-Pencil America): How The 50 States Differ On Revising Non-Competes
January 3, 2014 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Coast to Coast Noncompete Part 2: Still Going in 3 Courts in 2 States
December 23, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
December Is Noncompete Month in the General Media
December 16, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Coast-to-Coast Noncompete Dispute Highlights 3 Key Enforcement Strategies
October 22, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Governor Would Like Massachusetts to Join California As a Non-Noncompete State
September 16, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
State Lines May Not Be When It Comes to Noncompetes
September 3, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Do You Have Restrictive Covenants In Texas? If So, Be Careful What You Ask For
August 30, 2013 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
Ohio Supreme Court Reverses Self on Noncompete in Merger Situation
October 11, 2012 | Non-competes and Trade Secrets, Currents - Employment Law
RELATED PRACTICE AREAS
Subscribe
Do you want to receive more valuable insights directly in your inbox? Visit our subscription center and let us know what you're interested in learning more about.
View Subscription Center